ArticleFood & nutrition research2025
Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy can improve infection level nutrition condition and prognosis of patients with sepsis.
Article in Food & nutrition research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) on infection level, nutrition condition and prognosis of patients with sepsis. Method: According to the fecal elastase-1 (FE1) level, 68 sepsis patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) from 2014.11 to 2015. 12 in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups: regular nutritional support (RNS) group or PERT group. A total of 15 patients were dropout for various reasons.Finally, 25 patients were enrolled in PERT group and 28 in RNS group. APACHEII score, SOFA score, inflammatory biomarkers including C-reaction protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), procalcitonin (PCT), nutrition markers including prealbumin (PA), transferrin (TFN), retinol binding protein (RBP), creatinine/height index (CHI) were recorded at the day 1 (D1), day7 (D7) and day14 (D14) since they were admitted in ICU. These data were compared between and within the two groups chronologically. Also, the duration of vasoactive drug using (DVAD), mechanical ventilation (DMV), length of stay in ICU (LOS) and survival rate within 14 days were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no differences in general information (Age and gender) between PERT and RNS groups. Compared with the RNS group, CRP, WBC and PCT declined significantly at D14 in the PERT group. Especially, CRP declined significantly over time in both groups. In addition, compared with the RNS group, in the PERT group at D14, nutrition markers, including PA, TFN, RBP and CHI increased significantly, APACHEII score and SOFA score decreased significantly. And DVAD, DMV and LOS were significantly shortened in PERT group, but the survival rate within 14 days was not significantly changed. Conclusion: The PERT can improve infection level, nutrition condition and prognosis of patients with sepsis. And the underlying mechanism may be related to improve pancreatic exocrine insufficiency of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.