Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761497›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Voluntary Food Safety Disclosure and Government Grants: The Greater Food Approach Perspective.

Wentai Bi, Jie Huan, Peihang Zhang, Xudong Guo, Qi Qi, Yuan Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wentai BiCollege of Management Bohai University Jinzhou Liaoning P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-1278
Jie HuanCollege of Management Bohai University Jinzhou Liaoning P.R. China.
Peihang ZhangCollege of Management Bohai University Jinzhou Liaoning P.R. China.
Xudong GuoCollege of Management Bohai University Jinzhou Liaoning P.R. China.
Qi QiParty School of Liaoning Provincial Party Committee Shenyang Liaoning P.R. China.
Yuan LiangCollege of Management Bohai University Jinzhou Liaoning P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-3286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary information disclosure is an important bridge between firms and external stakeholders. Based on the data of listed food companies from 2008 to 2022, this study examines the impact of voluntary food safety information disclosure on the government's resource allocation decisions from the perspective of the greater food approach. Such disclosure has a resource-acquisition effect and can significantly increase the level of government grants. The aforementioned effect that is "not what it says on the tin" is only effective in the short term and does not allow for sustained benefits to be realized. The mechanism test established that the positive relationship between disclosure and government grants is significantly inhibited by market attention. Further research finds that this positive association is more pronounced among small-scale and ordinary urban firms, with the types concentrated in revenue-related government grants. This research enriches the literature on the economic consequences of voluntary disclosure and provides empirical evidence for the government to accurately screen firms' food safety status and information manipulation.

Indexed as

food safetygovernment grantsmarket attentionthe greater food approachvoluntary disclosure

Identifiers

PMID40761497
PMCPMC12319236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.