Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761460›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

From motion to meaning: understanding students' seating preferences in libraries through PIR-enabled machine learning and explainable AI.

Gizem Izmir Tunahan, Goksu Tuysuzoglu, Hector Altamirano

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gizem Izmir TunahanDepartment of Architecture, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Goksu TuysuzogluDepartment of Computer Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Hector AltamiranoUCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive, data-driven investigation into students' seating preferences within academic library environments, aiming to inform user-centered spatial design. Drawing on over 1.3 million ten-minute passive infrared (PIR) sensor observations collected throughout 2023 at the UCL Bartlett Library, we modeled seat-level occupancy using 24 spatial, environmental, and temporal features through advanced machine learning algorithms. Among the models tested, Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving a classification accuracy of 72.5%, with interpretability enhanced through SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) analysis. Findings reveal that seating behavior is shaped not by individual factors but by two dominant dimensions: (1) environmental controllability, including access to personal lighting and fresh air, and (2) distraction management, characterized by quiet surroundings, visual privacy, and low-stimulation workspace finishes. In contrast, features commonly presumed to be influential, such as desk width, fixed computer availability, or daylight alone, had minimal impact on seat choice. Despite extensive modeling and optimization, prediction accuracy plateaued at approximately 72%, reflecting the complexity and variability of human behavior in shared learning environments. By integrating long-term behavioral data with explainable machine learning, this study advances the evidence base for academic library design and offers actionable insights. These findings support design strategies that prioritize individual environmental control, as well as acoustic and visual privacy, offering actionable, evidence-based guidance for creating academic library environments that better support student comfort, focus, and engagement.

Indexed as

academic libraryexplainable AImachine learningoccupancy monitoringPIR sensorsseat preferencespatial behavioruser comfort

Identifiers

PMID40761460
PMCPMC12319776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.