ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
From motion to meaning: understanding students' seating preferences in libraries through PIR-enabled machine learning and explainable AI.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive, data-driven investigation into students' seating preferences within academic library environments, aiming to inform user-centered spatial design. Drawing on over 1.3 million ten-minute passive infrared (PIR) sensor observations collected throughout 2023 at the UCL Bartlett Library, we modeled seat-level occupancy using 24 spatial, environmental, and temporal features through advanced machine learning algorithms. Among the models tested, Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving a classification accuracy of 72.5%, with interpretability enhanced through SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) analysis. Findings reveal that seating behavior is shaped not by individual factors but by two dominant dimensions: (1) environmental controllability, including access to personal lighting and fresh air, and (2) distraction management, characterized by quiet surroundings, visual privacy, and low-stimulation workspace finishes. In contrast, features commonly presumed to be influential, such as desk width, fixed computer availability, or daylight alone, had minimal impact on seat choice. Despite extensive modeling and optimization, prediction accuracy plateaued at approximately 72%, reflecting the complexity and variability of human behavior in shared learning environments. By integrating long-term behavioral data with explainable machine learning, this study advances the evidence base for academic library design and offers actionable insights. These findings support design strategies that prioritize individual environmental control, as well as acoustic and visual privacy, offering actionable, evidence-based guidance for creating academic library environments that better support student comfort, focus, and engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.