Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761453›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Quantum psychology approach on enjoyment as mediator in relationship between L2 flow and engagement.

Ferdi Çelik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ferdi ÇelikDepartment of English Language Education, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Quantum psychology offers scholars a novel lens, to be preferred when Chaos/Complexity falls short of understanding the missing puzzle pieces in the complex interplay between cognitive and affective factors in second language acquisition (SLA). Adopting a quantum psychology approach, this study conceptualizes learner psychology as probabilistic and non-linear, proposing that flow, enjoyment, and engagement are dynamically entangled, akin to quantum principles of superposition and entanglement. Methods: To test this, the study investigates the mediating role of enjoyment in the relationship between psychological flow and academic engagement among 162 high school students in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted English as a Foreign Language (EFL) speaking and writing classes. Employing a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were collected using a validated Psychological Flow Scale, Academic Engagement Scale, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Scale. Results: Path analysis has revealed that psychological flow does not directly influence academic engagement; however, flow significantly predicts enjoyment, which in turn positively affects engagement. The indirect effect of flow on engagement through enjoyment was significant and indicated full mediation. Discussion: These findings challenge linear models of flow and engagement in SLA. The results, interpreted through a quantum perspective, emphasize the importance of fostering enjoyable learning experiences to enhance engagement, particularly in technology-enhanced contexts like AI-assisted classrooms. Pedagogical implications include designing interactive, enjoyable, and optimally challenging tasks to promote flow and enjoyment to sustain learner engagement. Future studies should investigate more mediators and use longitudinal designs to clarify these evolving relationships.

Indexed as

EFLflow and engagementforeign language enjoymentmediationnon-linear dynamicsquantum psychologySLA

Identifiers

PMID40761453
PMCPMC12319026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.