ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Cautionary response strategy and impairment of post-conflict response selection underlie age-related differences in a location-based Stroop task.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Research suggests that older adults have deficits in selective attention, a cognitive process often queried through the Stroop task. To tease apart whether this is due to failures to inhibit distracting information or to upregulate attention towards target information, younger and older adults completed a task called the Shape Stroop. Methods: In this task, participants had to name the color of a shape that was occluded by another shape. Critically, congruent or incongruent Stroop words were placed in either the target shape, the occluding (distractor) shape or in the background. We first modeled performance as a function of age-group, Stroop word congruency, and location. Results: The results indicate that older adults were more accurate but slower than younger adults to choose the correct shape color. For both younger and older adults, incongruent words induced slower reaction times when words were in the target location, indicating age-invariance in the Stroop effect. To further probe how early and/or late attentional processes contribute to performance and to interrogate the decision strategies adopted across different conditions, we also fit the dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention to our data. Discussion: Our results indicate that older adults tend to be more cautious and require more information before choosing a stimulus to attend to or making a decision. Although older adults' ability to inhibit irrelevant information seems intact, they show signs of slower information processing in the later stages of attentional processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.