ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding statutory rape and its management among healthcare workers in emergency wards in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: statutory rape is a critical public health and legal issue with severe consequences for survivors in Nigeria and is related to insufficient healthcare training, hindering effective case management. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare workers in emergency wards in Ibadan to identify gaps and challenges in statutory rape management. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted among 198 healthcare workers in Ibadan, using structured questionnaires and analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests. Results: the study revealed significant gaps in healthcare workers' KAP concerning statutory rape. While 81.3% of healthcare workers were aware of the term "statutory rape," only 75.3% understood the legal provisions related to it, such as the legal age of consent. Doctors had significantly higher KAP scores than nurses in all domains: knowledge (p= 0.0029), attitude (p= 0.0044), and practice (p= 0.0028). Despite recognizing the severity of statutory rape (76.3%), 33.3% of healthcare workers had never managed such cases, and many reported infrequent encounters with statutory rape cases. A significant proportion (65.2%) of healthcare workers identified inadequate forensic training as a major barrier, while (83.3%) cited legal and reporting constraints, and (31%) mentioned geographical access limitations. The most commonly reported physical and psychological symptoms observed in survivors included genital injuries (93.4%), psychological trauma (86%), STDs and infections (81.3%), bleeding (85.4%), and extra-genital injuries (69.2%). Conclusion: this study highlights deficiencies in healthcare workers´ knowledge and preparedness in statutory rape case management. Strengthening forensic training, legal awareness, and healthcare-legal collaboration is essential to improving response effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.