ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Regulatory-required post-marketing database studies in Japan could be leveraged to assess important potential risks as well as identified risks.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics and Future Perspectives of Available Electronic Health Record Databases in Japan.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Review
- Six-Year Trends in Real-World Data Use for Post-Marketing Surveillance of New Medical Products in Japan.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the characteristics of post-marketing database studies (PMDS) included in risk management plans (RMPs) across all therapeutic areas in Japan. Methods: Two researchers systematically and independently reviewed all RMPs listed on the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency website from April 2013 to December 2023. PMDS contained in RMPs were identified, reviewed, and summarized by study design, target objectives, and data source. Specific objectives were linked to the data source. Results: Among 648 RMPs retrieved/reviewed, 85 PMDS were identified from 63 RMPs targeting 138 safety and five effectiveness objectives. Among 85 PMDS, 57 (67.1%) PMDS targeted important identified risk and 29 (34.1%) targeted important potential risk. Cohort studies were the most prevalent study design (74/85, 87.1%), and 74.1% (63/85) included a comparator group. Common target safety objectives included "infections and infestations", "metabolism and nutrition disorders", "cardiac disorders" and "vascular disorders". The Medical Data Vision database was the most frequently used data source for PMDS (32/85, 37.5%) followed by the Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET Conclusion: In Japan, PMDS are usually cohort studies with targeted safety objectives. Most studies currently target important identified risk rather than important potential risk and may not make full use of the advantages of PMDS that can include large populations, comparator groups, and that can assess the occurrence of rare adverse events. These results could be informative for pharmaceutical companies planning post-marketing studies as pharmacovigilance activities. Early public availability of PMDS protocols would promote improved study methodology and could potentially improve the scientific value of PMDS in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.