Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761372›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2025

Effectiveness of filling structures within nerve guidance conduits in a rat sciatic nerve injury model.

Taisuke Kasuya, Shunsuke Nishimoto, Toru Iwahashi, Junichi Sayanagi, Yukio Hirai, Toshiki Shimada, Yoshiaki Yoshimura, Katsuyuki Konishi, Mai Konishi, Ryoya Shiode and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Taisuke KasuyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shunsuke NishimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Toru IwahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Junichi SayanagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yukio HiraiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Toshiki ShimadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yoshiaki YoshimuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Katsuyuki KonishiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Mai KonishiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Ryoya ShiodeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Satoshi MiyamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kunihiro OkaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tsuyoshi MuraseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Seiji OkadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hiroyuki TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The gold standard treatment for peripheral nerve gap injury is nerve autograft transplantation. Although various nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) have been developed as alternatives to autografting, few reports have evaluated the effects of the internal structure of NGCs on nerve regeneration. We investigated how the internal structure of NGCs affects nerve regeneration. Methods: In 30 male Wistar rats, a 5 mm segment of the left sciatic nerve was resected, creating a gap. The animals were then randomly divided into two groups. A 7 mm polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduit, with (PGA-c group) or without a collagen filling (PGA group), was used to bridge the gap (n = 15 for each group). At 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively, longitudinal sciatic nerve slices were fluorescently immunostained with RECA-1 for endothelial cells, S100 for Schwann cells, and TUJ1 for axons. The fluorescence-positive areas were quantitatively evaluated. Next, 32 male Wistar rats underwent resection of a 10 mm segment of the left sciatic nerve. The animals were then assigned into four groups: sham group, autograft group, PGA-c group (transplantation of 12-mm PGA-c), and hollow PGA group (transplantation of 12 mm hollow PGA) (n = 8 for each group). At 12 weeks postoperatively, morphological evaluations and neurofunctional analyses were performed. Results: In longitudinal sciatic nerve slices, the PGA-c group had significantly larger RECA-1-positive areas proximally and distally at 2 weeks, larger S100-positive areas proximally at 2 weeks, and larger TUJ1-positive areas proximally at 4 weeks postoperatively than the PGA group. In the 10 mm nerve defect model, the PGA-c group had a significantly higher percentage of myelinated axons, isometric tetanic force, and tibialis anterior muscle wet weight than the PGA group. Conclusions: The internal filling structure of the NGCs may promote nerve regeneration by providing a scaffold for cells involved in nerve regeneration and may restore motor function. These findings provide new insights into the further structural development of NGCs suitable for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Indexed as

Internal structureNerve guidance conduitPeripheral nerve gap injuryPeripheral nerve regenerationPolyglycolic acid

Identifiers

PMID40761372
PMCPMC12320549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.