ArticleRegenerative therapy2025
Effectiveness of filling structures within nerve guidance conduits in a rat sciatic nerve injury model.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The gold standard treatment for peripheral nerve gap injury is nerve autograft transplantation. Although various nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) have been developed as alternatives to autografting, few reports have evaluated the effects of the internal structure of NGCs on nerve regeneration. We investigated how the internal structure of NGCs affects nerve regeneration. Methods: In 30 male Wistar rats, a 5 mm segment of the left sciatic nerve was resected, creating a gap. The animals were then randomly divided into two groups. A 7 mm polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduit, with (PGA-c group) or without a collagen filling (PGA group), was used to bridge the gap (n = 15 for each group). At 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively, longitudinal sciatic nerve slices were fluorescently immunostained with RECA-1 for endothelial cells, S100 for Schwann cells, and TUJ1 for axons. The fluorescence-positive areas were quantitatively evaluated. Next, 32 male Wistar rats underwent resection of a 10 mm segment of the left sciatic nerve. The animals were then assigned into four groups: sham group, autograft group, PGA-c group (transplantation of 12-mm PGA-c), and hollow PGA group (transplantation of 12 mm hollow PGA) (n = 8 for each group). At 12 weeks postoperatively, morphological evaluations and neurofunctional analyses were performed. Results: In longitudinal sciatic nerve slices, the PGA-c group had significantly larger RECA-1-positive areas proximally and distally at 2 weeks, larger S100-positive areas proximally at 2 weeks, and larger TUJ1-positive areas proximally at 4 weeks postoperatively than the PGA group. In the 10 mm nerve defect model, the PGA-c group had a significantly higher percentage of myelinated axons, isometric tetanic force, and tibialis anterior muscle wet weight than the PGA group. Conclusions: The internal filling structure of the NGCs may promote nerve regeneration by providing a scaffold for cells involved in nerve regeneration and may restore motor function. These findings provide new insights into the further structural development of NGCs suitable for peripheral nerve regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.