ArticleBMJ public health2025
Effect of a multicomponent HPV intervention on self-reported HPV vaccine uptake and intention among French adolescents and parents: results from the national, cluster-randomised PrevHPV trial.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04945655 (Impact of a School- and Primary Care-based Multicomponent Intervention on HPV Vaccination Acceptability Among French Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of a School- and Primary Care-based Multicomponent Intervention on HPV Vaccination Acceptability Among French Adolescents: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections cause several cancers, including nearly all cervical cancer cases. While there are safe and effective vaccines, the adolescent HPV vaccine coverage in France is low (<50%). Thus, we studied the effect of municipality-wide interventions to increase HPV vaccine uptake and intention among middle school students. Methods: This cluster-randomised trial used an incomplete factorial design to arrange three components (in-school education, motivation, mobilisation (EMM); in-school vaccination; and local general practitioner (GP) trainings) into six intervention conditions, which were randomly assigned to 91 participating French municipalities. We assessed HPV vaccine status using online self-reported questionnaires that students (typically aged 13-14) and parents completed at baseline and 5-month follow-up. Using adjusted linear regression, we estimated differences in (1) vaccine uptake and (2) uptake and intention to vaccinate, both by randomisation arm and by intervention component. We explored subgroup effects by at-home multilingualism, gender, age and parental education. Results: 2047 of 2664 (74%) students were unvaccinated against HPV at baseline. The 5-month probability of first-dose vaccine uptake in the control group was 0·09 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.11). Vaccine campaigns alone contributed a 24-percentage-point (0.18, 0.30) increase in uptake compared with the control group. EMM was only effective in increasing vaccine uptake among monolingual francophone students, and we detected no effect from GP training. Vaccine campaigns and EMM both increased the combined outcome of vaccine intention and first-dose uptake, but EMM had the same subgroup effect. Questionnaire data from parents (N=236) were sparser but demonstrated similar overall trends. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that in-school HPV vaccine campaigns effectively increase HPV vaccine uptake among adolescents without exacerbating extant disparities in vaccine uptake. EMM can also be a useful tool to increase HPV vaccine intention but must be improved to bridge disparities in its effectiveness. GP training results were inconclusive. Trial registration number: NCT04945655.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.