Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761306›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2025

Healthcare Providers and Patients Perception on Telehealth Services Adoption for Post-Operative Follow-Ups at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (Ghana).

Jonathan Kissi, Vivian Kruh, Godwin Adzakpah, Caleb Annobil, Daniel Kwame Kwansah Quansah, Sarkodie Yaw Appiah, Veronica Adwubi, Kerzia Jacobell Owusuwa, Daniel Opare, Joseph Owusu-Marfo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jonathan KissiDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2942-5654
Vivian KruhFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Nordland, Norway.
Godwin AdzakpahDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-6733
Caleb AnnobilSchwarzman College, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Daniel Kwame Kwansah QuansahDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Sarkodie Yaw AppiahDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Veronica AdwubiSurgical Department, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Greater Accra Region, Ghana.
Kerzia Jacobell OwusuwaKorle Bu Teaching Hospital, Polyclinic, Accra, Greater Accra Region, Ghana.
Daniel OpareSurgical Department, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Greater Accra Region, Ghana.
Joseph Owusu-MarfoDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Disease Control, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Northern Region, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Telehealth is revolutionizing healthcare, particularly in post-operative care accessibility. However, technological limitations, costs, and communication barriers hinder its full implementation. This study examines healthcare providers' and patients' perception on telehealth services adoption for post-operative follow-ups at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Ghana. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed to collect data involving 350 participants, (doctors (29), nurses (96), and patients (225)) at KBTH's surgical department using the priori power calculation method. Participants were selected via purposive and convenience sampling. There was a pilot-tested electronic and paper questionnaire administered by trained research assistants. The instrument captured multidimensional perception indices (eg, clinical efficacy, convenience, economic burden) on validated Likert scales alongside socio-demographic and telehealth utilization covariates. Data were managed in REDCap with mandatory fields to minimize missing responses and anonymized identifiers to reduce bias. Analyses comprised descriptive statistics and proportions in IBM SPSS v26 and R v4.2.1. Results: A substantial 76.6% of stakeholders agree or strongly agree that telehealth reliably monitors minor postoperative conditions. Convenience and efficiency are paramount, with 82.9% of participants finding virtual follow-ups more convenient and 86.6% reporting significant time savings relative to in-person visits. Infection-control benefits are widely recognized (85.2%), and patient-provider rapport remains strong, with only 10.9% expressing discomfort. Major barriers include unstable broadband (83.4%), limited on-site technical support (66.0%), poor audiovisual quality (81.7%), and prohibitive data/device costs (61.4%). Key facilitators encompass robust security measures trusted by 73.8% of users, regulatory confidence (59.7%), perceived clinical equivalence (76.5%), and enhanced access for underserved populations (82.6%). Conclusion: Telehealth improves accessibility and efficiency in minor post-operative care. However, addressing technological barriers, insurance issues, and communication challenges is crucial. A hybrid approach integrating telehealth with in-person visits is recommended to enhance care quality and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

healthcare accessibilitypatient satisfactionpost-operative careteaching hospitaltelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40761306
PMCPMC12319265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.