Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761269›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2025

Testicular varicocele embolization using CO2, gadolinium and lipiodol as contrast agents in a patient with an iodinated contrast allergy.

Virjen Patel, Benedict Thomson, Bisher Ghazal-Aswad, Gregory C Makris, Athanasios Diamantopoulos

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Virjen PatelDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Benedict ThomsonDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Bisher Ghazal-AswadDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Gregory C MakrisDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Athanasios DiamantopoulosDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 44-year-old gentleman was referred to IR for varicocele embolization (VE) by the fertility clinic following investigation for oligospermia. A testicular ultrasound identified a left grade II varicocele. The patient had known anaphylaxis to water-soluble iodinated contrast. We planned to perform VE with a combination of alternative contrast agents. The procedure was performed under general anesthetic to mitigate the pain related to carbon dioxide angiography. Following standard venous access techniques of the right internal jugular vein, carbon dioxide was used as the main contrast agent with digital subtraction venogram, to confirm catheter selection of left testicular vein. This demonstrated a large varicocele. After coil deployment the gadolinium-based contrast agent Dotarem, was injected and venography used to confirm occlusion of the left testicular vein. Then a combination of 4 mL of 3% Fibro vein and 2 mL of Lipiodol was injected to achieve embolization of the testicular vein collaterals. The patient made an uneventful recovery. This is the first reported case of both carbon dioxide angiography and gadolinium being used in VE. It appears safe and effective. The use of alternative contrast media appears safe and effective in VE in those patients with contraindications to ionic agents. Due to their different properties, a combination of alternative contrast agents can be more effective than a single agent. We provide a pictorial review of the case and an educational summary on the indications and practical uses of various alternative contrast agents in IR procedures in a patient with a water-soluble iodinated contrast allergy.

Indexed as

Carbon dioxide angiographyFibro veinGadoliniumInterventional radiologylipiodolNon-iodinated contrast agentVaricocele embolization

Identifiers

PMID40761269
PMCPMC12320522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.