ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Identification of novel molecular subtypes and construction of a prognostic signature via multi-omics analysis and machine learning in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and targeted therapeutic strategies has significantly improved the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with sensitive gene mutations. However, patients harboring rare or no actionable mutations were rarely benefit from these targeted therapies. This study aimed to identify novel molecular subtypes and construct a prognostic signature to enhance the stratification of LUAD prognosis. Materials and methods: Novel molecular subtypes of LUAD patients were identified by applying 10 distinct clustering algorithms on multi-omics data. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data were integrated to characterize subtype-specific immune microenvironments. A multi-omics and machine learning-driven prognostic signature (MO-MLPS) was constructed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD dataset using ten machine learning algorithms and subsequently validated across six independent datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The robustness of the model was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We further confirmed the effects of ANLN knockdown and the expression of a domain-negative anillin protein (dnANLN) via western blotting, cell proliferation assays, flow cytometry, and transwell migration assays Results: Our analysis revealed that the novel molecular subtypes exhibited differences in prognoses, biological functions, and immune infiltration profiles in LUAD. The MO-MLPS was successfully established and validated across TCGA-LUAD cohorts, six independent GEO datasets, and their composite meta-cohort. Higher risk scores from the MO-MLPS correlated with poorer prognosis in LUAD, with AUC values exceeding 0.5 at 1, 3, and 5 years across various cohorts. The signature outperformed 49 previously published prognostic signatures. Furthermore, patients classified as high risk exhibited significantly worse overall and progression-free survival than those classified as low risk. Notably, ANLN knockdown and dnANLN expression significantly inhibited cell proliferation and migration Conclusion: A comprehensive analysis of multi-omics data redefines the molecular subtype of LUAD patients. The MO-MLPS derived from subtype characteristics has the potential to serve as a clinically valuable prognostic tool. Furthermore, ANLN emerges as a promising novel therapeutic target in the treatment of LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.