Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761262›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Identification of novel molecular subtypes and construction of a prognostic signature via multi-omics analysis and machine learning in lung adenocarcinoma.

Ke Ma, Jie Xu, Congyue Wang, Xu Cao, Wenjie Yu, Jingjing Xi, Xuan Zhang, Jiamin Zhan, Yang Liu, Aoyang Yu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ke Ma *Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jie Xu *Institute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Congyue Wang *Institute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xu CaoInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Wenjie YuInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jingjing XiInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xuan ZhangInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jiamin ZhanInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yang LiuInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Aoyang YuInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Shuhan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yanhua LiuInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chong ChenInstitute of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoli MaiDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and targeted therapeutic strategies has significantly improved the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with sensitive gene mutations. However, patients harboring rare or no actionable mutations were rarely benefit from these targeted therapies. This study aimed to identify novel molecular subtypes and construct a prognostic signature to enhance the stratification of LUAD prognosis. Materials and methods: Novel molecular subtypes of LUAD patients were identified by applying 10 distinct clustering algorithms on multi-omics data. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data were integrated to characterize subtype-specific immune microenvironments. A multi-omics and machine learning-driven prognostic signature (MO-MLPS) was constructed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD dataset using ten machine learning algorithms and subsequently validated across six independent datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The robustness of the model was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We further confirmed the effects of ANLN knockdown and the expression of a domain-negative anillin protein (dnANLN) via western blotting, cell proliferation assays, flow cytometry, and transwell migration assays Results: Our analysis revealed that the novel molecular subtypes exhibited differences in prognoses, biological functions, and immune infiltration profiles in LUAD. The MO-MLPS was successfully established and validated across TCGA-LUAD cohorts, six independent GEO datasets, and their composite meta-cohort. Higher risk scores from the MO-MLPS correlated with poorer prognosis in LUAD, with AUC values exceeding 0.5 at 1, 3, and 5 years across various cohorts. The signature outperformed 49 previously published prognostic signatures. Furthermore, patients classified as high risk exhibited significantly worse overall and progression-free survival than those classified as low risk. Notably, ANLN knockdown and dnANLN expression significantly inhibited cell proliferation and migration Conclusion: A comprehensive analysis of multi-omics data redefines the molecular subtype of LUAD patients. The MO-MLPS derived from subtype characteristics has the potential to serve as a clinically valuable prognostic tool. Furthermore, ANLN emerges as a promising novel therapeutic target in the treatment of LUAD.

Indexed as

lung adenocarcinomamachine learningmulti-omicsprognostic signaturesingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40761262
PMCPMC12320504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.