ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Bladder cancer microbiome and its association with chemoresponse.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome in Gastrointestinal Tumors: Implications in Oncogenesis and Therapeutic Response : Microbiome in Gastrointestinal Tumors.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Specialized Nursing-Led Interventions for Bladder Cancer Management: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Clinical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Intratumoral microbiome: the double-edged sword in remodeling cancer immunotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Urinary microbiota in bladder cancer: insights into pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Metabolite-mediated mechanisms linking the urinary microbiome to bladder cancer.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The microbiome is widely known to cause come types of cancer, modify cancer biology, and impact therapeutic efficacy. Despite the urinary microbiome being one of the most clinically significant microbiomes in human health, it is one of the least well-described. Methods and materials: To begin to annotate the urinary microbiome present in bladder cancers, we analyzed human genome-filtered sequencing data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) from 116 tumors (duplicates from 22 tumors), 22 adjacent normal bladder tissues, and 99 blood samples to classify reads originating from known microbiota. We also performed 16S rRNA sequencing on urine samples from 55 patients with urothelial carcinoma and 13 non-cancer patients. Additionally, we compared microbiome from matched urine samples and archival diagnostic tumor samples from 21 bladder cancer patients. For our animal experiments, starting at 8-12 weeks of age, male (n=33) and female (n=22) C57BL/6 mice were administered 0.05% N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)-nitrosamine (BBN) in drinking water for 12 weeks then switched to regular water. Control mice drank regular water. Bladders were collected for 16S rRNA sequencing pre-exposure, after 6 and 12 weeks of exposure, and at the time of tumor identification (typically between 14-22 weeks from start of treatment using this model). Finally, because of our findings, we tested the effects of Results: Twenty-seven viral and bacterial species were found to be enriched in the tumor samples from TCGA cohort, including sex-specific enrichment of Conclusions: In summary, we identify many new relationships between the microbiome and bladder cancer that are clinically relevant and lay the groundwork important functional studies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.