Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

A clinical prediction model for blood pressure changes after renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension.

Yishuan Zhang, Ruiqing He, Chen Chen, Hong Zhang, Lingyan Li, Rongxue Xiao, Shuangyu Chen, Shuyi Wu, Zongjun Liu, Junqing Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yishuan Zhang *Shanghai Putuo Central School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ruiqing He *Department of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chen Chen *Department of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hong Zhang *Department of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lingyan LiDepartment of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Rongxue XiaoDepartment of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuangyu ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuyi WuDepartment of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zongjun LiuShanghai Putuo Central School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Junqing GaoDepartment of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop clinical prediction models to estimate blood pressure changes in hypertensive patients undergoing renal denervation (RDN). Methods: This single-center, prospective interventional study enrolled 70 hypertensive patients undergoing RDN between July 2022 and December 2023, with clinical data collected systematically before and after the procedure. Variable selection for modeling was performed through a rigorous process incorporating univariate analysis and clinical relevance assessment. Subsequently, two distinct clinical prediction models were developed and subjected to comparative evaluation. The primary outcomes were the absolute changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 6 months after RDN. Results: In both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Ridge regression models, seven variables [including index of microvascular resistance (IMR), preoperative SBP, age and creatinine] were significantly associated with SBP change, while four variables were significantly associated with DBP change. In the prediction model on SBP change, compared to the OLS model, the Ridge regression exhibited lower prediction errors [mean absolute error [MAE]: 6.40 vs. 6.95; mean squared error [MSE]: 65.58 vs. 76.15] and a higher R² (0.79 vs. 0.72). In the DBP model, the Ridge regression also achieved a lower MAE (3.62 vs. 3.73) and a higher R² (0.77 vs. 0.71). Conclusion: This study developed and compared predictive models for estimating blood pressure response at 6-month follow-up after RDN in patients with resistant hypertension. The Ridge regression model exhibited superior predictive accuracy and model stability. The model indicated that IMR was a factor associated with postoperative blood pressure reduction. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier, ChiCTR2200058696.

Indexed as

blood pressure changeclinical prediction modelindex of microvascular resistancerenal denervationresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID40761232
PMCPMC12319003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.