Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761206›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2025

Clinical-CT mismatch in acute pancreatitis: a new concept and report of two cases.

Yingjie Wu, Xiaolei Yi, Maoyong Xu, Hao Liang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yingjie Wu *Institute of TCM Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Xiaolei Yi *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Changsha Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Changsha Eighth Hospital), Changsha, China.
Maoyong XuDepartment of Radiology, Changsha Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Changsha Eighth Hospital), Changsha, China.
Hao LiangInstitute of TCM Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-9717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a condition with varying severity, ranging from mild to severe, each presenting different prognostic outcomes. Accurate and early assessment of AP severity is crucial for determining appropriate treatment and management. Traditionally, the severity of AP has been evaluated using clinical criteria or imaging, but discrepancies between these assessments can complicate clinical decision-making. Case Description: This case report presents two patients with AP, where a mismatch was observed between clinical and imaging severity assessments. In the first case, laboratory tests suggested mild AP, while computed tomography (CT) imaging indicated severe pathology. In contrast, the second case showed severe AP according to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, but the CT imaging only revealed mild findings. This clinical-CT mismatch highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to evaluating AP severity, rather than relying on a single assessment method. Conclusions: The report introduces the concept of clinical-CT mismatch in the assessment of AP. It emphasizes the importance of integrating clinical scores, such as APACHE II, with imaging findings to provide a more accurate and reliable evaluation of severity. By doing so, clinicians can enhance decision-making and improve management strategies for AP.

Indexed as

Acute pancreatitis (AP)case reportmismatchseverity assessment

Identifiers

PMID40761206
PMCPMC12319587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.