ArticleAME case reports2025
Clinical insights from the management of a giant immature teratoma in an infant-a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The article discusses a rare case of a giant immature teratoma (IMT) in an infant, highlighting the challenges in diagnosing and managing this type of germ cell tumor that arises from abnormal embryonic cell development. Teratoma growth syndrome represents a rare clinical manifestation, posing significant challenges in differential diagnosis, particularly when distinguishing it from peritoneal gliomatosis or progressive germinoma. In essence, growing teratoma syndrome (GTS) constitutes a distinct and intricate clinical entity that requires meticulous monitoring and management to enhance patient outcomes. Case Description: The patient was a male infant, presented with a palpable mass in the upper abdomen at 4 months of age. Initial ultrasound and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels suggested a retroperitoneal teratoma. After surgery, the diagnosis was confirmed as an IMT [World Health Organization (WHO) grade III]. Despite initial chemotherapy with BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin) and TIC (nab-paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin) regimens, the tumor continued to grow, and the patient experienced GTS. A second surgery was performed, and the patient was subsequently treated with TCAV (nab-paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and vincristine) and TIC chemotherapy, leading to normalization of AFP levels and no evidence of disease over a 4-year follow-up. Conclusions: GTS is a rare clinical manifestation that presents substantial challenges in differential diagnosis, particularly in distinguishing it from conditions such as peritoneal gliomatosis or progressive germinoma. Fundamentally, this syndrome represents a unique and complex clinical entity necessitating careful monitoring and management to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.