ArticleAME case reports2025
Laparoscopic management of transverse testicular ectopia with spermatic cord fusion: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fused variant of crossed testicular ectopia: A case report and discussion of the literature.Urology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transverse testicular ectopia (TTE) is a rare congenital anomaly where both testes descend through the same inguinal canal and are located on the same side. Cases with fused spermatic cords are particularly rare and present unique surgical challenges. Case Description: We report the case of an 8-month-old male infant with bilateral cryptorchidism and an empty scrotum since birth. Preoperative ultrasonography identified two testicular-like structures near the right internal inguinal ring. Laparoscopic exploration revealed bilateral patent processus vaginalis, with both testes located near the right internal inguinal ring. The left spermatic cord crossed the pelvis and fused with the right spermatic cord. Both testes appeared normal in size, with separate epididymides and vas deferens. Surgical management involved careful dissection and separation of the fused spermatic cords, followed by bilateral orchiopexy via the respective inguinal canals and repair of the processus vaginalis. At an 8-year postoperative follow-up, ultrasound confirmed that both testes were well-positioned with normal size and blood supply. Testosterone levels were monitored annually and remained within the normal range. This case highlights its significant role in the management of complex anomalies like TTE. Conclusions: The postoperative course was uneventful, and an 8-year follow-up demonstrated that both testes remained well-positioned, with normal size, blood supply, and testosterone levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.