ArticleAME case reports2025
Primary reconstruction of depressed frontal bone fracture including cranialization of frontal sinus and repair of forehead skin: a case report and literature review.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. A compound depressed skull fracture (DSF) occurs when a laceration over the fracture exposes the internal cranial cavity to the external environment. DSFs are considered surgical emergencies that require prompt intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, the literature lacks comprehensive information regarding the risks of intracranial infection and seizures, surgical indications, and the impact of surgical management on the functional and neurological outcomes of penetrating craniocerebral injuries (PCCIs). Our case report aims to enhance the existing literature by providing an overview of the management of frontal bone and frontal sinus fractures. We will emphasize key aspects such as the timing of surgery (early Case Description: We present a 21-year-old male who was involved in an MVA with an unknown mechanism and was brought by ambulance to our emergency department at Dammam Medical Complex. Initially, the patient was vitally stable, conscious, alert, and oriented. He had multiple scalp lacerations, including a mid-forehead open wound laceration with bone fragments and some brain tissue protruding out of the lacerated wound defect. After clinical deterioration, the patient underwent an urgent surgical exploration and elevation of skull fracture along with primary skull reconstruction. The mid-forehead wound defect was repaired in collaboration with the plastic surgery team. Conclusions: Although a depressed frontal skull fracture involving both the outer and inner tables of the frontal sinus needs to be addressed on a case-by-case basis, cranialization of the inner table is preferred. Titanium mesh is a satisfactory alternative in case of inapplicable use of the patient's own bone fragments and chips. Collaborating with the plastic surgery team when dealing with complex mid-forehead wounds is also advisable to ensure optimal cosmetic outcomes. It is advisable to use anti-seizure medications (ASMs) prophylactically to prevent early, but not late, post-traumatic seizures (PTSs). A short course of broad-spectrum antibiotics is recommended in cases of open (compound) depressed fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.