ArticleAME case reports2025
Case report: proximal tibiofibular joint instability-a forgotten cause in revision total knee arthroplasty?
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proximal tibiofibular joint instability (PTJI) is a rare condition, particularly in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision, with only one prior case reported. This case highlights the importance of considering PTJI in patients with chronic lateral knee pain and instability following TKA and demonstrates a novel stabilization approach for managing this challenging condition. Case Description: A 73-year-old female with a history of multiple knee surgeries presented to our clinic due to increasing lateral knee pain radiating along the syndesmosis, aggravated by activities like squatting. Clinical examination revealed anteroposterior subluxation of the fibular head, suggesting PTJI. Radiological findings confirmed tibial component loosening, and the diagnosis of aseptic loosening with PTJI was made. Given her complex surgical history, a two-stage revision was planned. The first stage involved prosthesis removal, bacteriological sampling, and spacer placement. The second stage included revision TKA and proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) stabilization using a Twin Tail Tight-Rope™ system and Arthrex endobutton, preserving joint mobility and restoring functional stability. A hinged revision knee prosthesis was then implanted. The patient had an uneventful recovery. At 1-year follow-up, the pain score was 1/10 and she achieved good mobility. Radiographs showed satisfactory implant positioning. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score of 15/96 indicated a successful outcome. Conclusions: PTJI is rare and is not typically associated with TKA. This case report highlights a unique presentation of PTJI in a multi-revised TKA, raising concerns about the potential role of repeated proximal tibial resections in ligamentous instability of the PTFJ. The specific localization of pain and its resolution following PTFJ fixation support this hypothesis. Therefore, careful assessment of the PTFJ should be considered in TKA revisions, particularly in cases involving extensive lateral tibial resections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.