ArticleAME case reports2025
Gastric banding adjustment catheter dislodgement and perforation into the colon: case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a safe and effective method in bariatric surgery. Complications, which are relatively rare (10-20%), are related either to the band such as band slippage, pouch dilation, band erosion, intraluminal band migration or to the port-adjustment-tube system such as infection, tube disconnection and dislocation. Dislocation of the adjustment catheter perforating into the colon is extremely rare, our present case is the third publication on this complication. Case Description: In our present case, we report on an asymptomatic patient with intraluminal penetration of the dislodged adjustment tube into the colon 26 years after implantation of a gastric banding system. We revealed the complication randomly by positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in the course of a tumor staging of a newly diagnosed lung cancer. The gastric band was removed laparoscopically, the adjustment tube however, had to be cut through due to extended adhesions and could only partially be removed. The rest of the catheter passed spontaneously via rectum on the following day. Conclusions: Intraluminal penetration of the dislodged adjustment tube into the colon is extremely rare and may be asymptomatic such as in case of our patient. Other relevant complications after gastric band implantation may also remain undetected. During long-term follow up, occasionally performed imaging should be considered also in asymptomatic patients with implanted gastric banding system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.