ArticleHealth promotion practice2025
Community-Based Intervention to Promote Awareness and Implementation Accuracy of Food and Beverage Tax Policies in Stores on Navajo Nation.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnhealthy food and beverage taxes are gaining global momentum, but implementation complexities at the retailer level are poorly understood. The only such policy in the United States, a 2014 Navajo Nation legislation, applies a 2% tax to unhealthy foods and beverages, while exempting healthy foods and beverages from their 6% Navajo sales tax. In 2019, approximately half of small stores had not implemented both taxes correctly, primarily the tax exemption. Therefore, this study aimed to provide culturally-informed promotional materials to enhance implementation accuracy in these stores and test the impact.
methodsStores (N = 20) were randomly assigned to receive early promotional materials versus a waitlist group. Three to 6 months later, we visited all stores to purchase healthy and less healthy items, at which time waitlist stores received materials. Implementation accuracy of the junk food tax and exemption were tracked and compared.
resultsOverall implementation accuracy of both taxes increased from 0% to 20% at follow-up (p = .013). Tax waiver accuracy increased from 5% to 30% (p = .065). Comparing intervention versus waitlist stores, we observed no difference in implementation of tax exemption and a non-significant increase in accuracy of added tax on unhealthy foods and beverages (90% vs. 70%, p = .284). The study process revealed strengths and barriers to impactful store outreach. DISCUSSION: Grounded in community partnership, we explored a promotional outreach strategy to enhance accurate implementation of Navajo Nation food and beverage taxes. Our findings suggest store outreach and promotional materials could address confusion issues, while barriers related to store capacity merit further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.