Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761032›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Improving diagnostic accuracy of ovarian torsion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A prospective comparative clinical study of performance diagnosis.

Anne-Laure Fijean, Gabriela Hossu, Aboubaker Cherifi, Marine Beaumont, Olivier Morel, Charline Bertholdt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04522219 (Contribution of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Torsion), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04522219 phase3terminatednot on this map

Contribution of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Torsion: a Prospective Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2021 to 2023Enrolled11ConditionsAdnexal TorsionArmsContrast enhanced ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Improving diagnostic accuracy of ovarian torsion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A prospective comparative clinical study of performance diagnosis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne-Laure FijeanObstetrics and Gynecology Department, CHRU Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Gabriela HossuInserm, CIC, Innovation Technologique, CHRU Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Aboubaker CherifiInserm, CIC, Innovation Technologique, CHRU Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Marine BeaumontInserm, CIC, Innovation Technologique, CHRU Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Olivier MorelObstetrics and Gynecology Department, CHRU Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Charline BertholdtObstetrics and Gynecology Department, CHRU Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-5363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluates the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for improving diagnosis of adnexal torsion in women with acute abdominal pain.

methodsThis was a pilot study of the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the detection of adnexal torsion. All women in our center with planned surgery for suspicion of adnexal torsion were included. The final diagnosis was confirmed during surgical intervention to classify "torsion" and "control" groups. Qualitative imaging analyses were performed blindly of the final diagnosis by an expert and nonexpert obstetrician and gynecologist (Obgyn).

resultsSix ovaries were included in the torsion group and eight ovaries in the control group. A total of 476 images from 14 included cases were analyzed by one expert and 34 ObGyn. The sensitivity was 100% (confidence interval [CI] 95% [59-100]) and 84.3% (CI 95% [78.7-88.9]) and the specificity 86% (CI 95% [42-100]) and 89.8% (CI 95% [85.4-93.2]) for expert and nonexpert Obgyn, respectively.

conclusionThe diagnostic performance of CEUS to diagnose adnexal torsion is high.

Indexed as

Adnexal DiseasesOvarian TorsionAbdominal PainAdultContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyYoung AdultContrast Mediaacute abdominal painadnexal torsioncontrast‐enhanced ultrasoundfunctional imaginggynecologic emergencyimaging diagnosisovarian cystultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID40761032
PMCPMC12790659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.