ArticleEcology letters2025
Social Microbial Transmission in a Solitary Mammal.
Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The island biology of the host microbiome.Trends in microbiology · 2026Review
- Social Microbial Transmission in a Solitary Mammal.Ecology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial transmission is hypothesised to be a major benefit of sociality, facilitated by affiliative behaviours such as grooming and communal nesting in group-living animals. Whether microbial transmission is also present in animals that do not form groups because territoriality limits interactions and prevents group formation remains unknown. Here, we investigate relationships among gut microbiota, population density and dynamic behavioural and spatial measures of territoriality in wild North American red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). Periods of high population density predicted population-level gut microbial homogeneity but individual-level diversification, alongside changes in obligately anaerobic, non-sporulating taxa indicative of social transmission. Microbial alpha-diversity increased with more frequent territorial intrusions, and pairs with stronger intrusion-based social associations had more similar gut microbiota. As some of the first evidence for social microbial transmission in a solitary system, our findings suggest that fluctuations in density and territorial behaviours can homogenise and diversify host microbiomes among otherwise non-interacting animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.