ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
MMRAG: multi-mode retrieval-augmented generation with large language models for biomedical in-context learning.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- EPEE: towards efficient and effective foundation models in biomedicine.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Data-efficient biomedical in-context learning: a diversity-enhanced submodular perspective.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Augmenting Orbital Debris Identification with Neo4j-Enabled Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multimodal Large Language Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improving electronic health record processing of large language models via retrieval-augmented generation: A case study on dietary supplements.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo optimize in-context learning in biomedical natural language processing by improving example selection. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe introduce a novel multi-mode retrieval-augmented generation (MMRAG) framework, which integrates 4 retrieval strategies: (1) Random Mode, selecting examples arbitrarily; (2) Top Mode, retrieving the most relevant examples based on similarity; (3) Diversity Mode, ensuring variation in selected examples; and (4) Class Mode, selecting category-representative examples. This study evaluates MMRAG on 3 core biomedical NLP tasks: Named Entity Recognition (NER), Relation Extraction (RE), and Text Classification (TC). The datasets used include BC2GM for gene and protein mention recognition (NER), DDI for drug-drug interaction extraction (RE), GIT for general biomedical information extraction (RE), and HealthAdvice for health-related text classification (TC). The framework is tested with 2 large language models (Llama-2-7B and Llama-3-8B) and 3 retrievers (Contriever, MedCPT, and BGE-Large) to assess performance across different retrieval strategies.
resultsThe results from the Random Mode indicate that providing more examples in the prompt improves the model's generation performance. Meanwhile, Top Mode and Diversity Mode significantly outperform Random Mode on the RE (DDI) task, achieving an F1 score of 0.9669-a 26.4% improvement. Among the 3 retrievers tested, Contriever outperformed the other 2 in a greater number of experiments. Additionally, Llama 2 and Llama 3 demonstrated varying capabilities across different tasks, with Llama 3 showing a clear advantage in handling NER tasks.
conclusionMMRAG effectively enhances biomedical in-context learning by refining example selection, mitigating data scarcity issues, and demonstrating superior adaptability for NLP-driven healthcare applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.