Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760800›Full record

Trial reportBrain and behavior2025

Variant Target Effects on Motor Learning With M1 Anodal tDCS.

Joselyn Perez, Quinn McCallion, Brach Poston, Zachary A Riley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joselyn PerezDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Quinn McCallionSchool of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University-Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Brach PostonDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Zachary A RileySchool of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University-Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-1398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLearning a motor skill usually involves practicing the same task repetitively with the same end target or goal. Many overhand throwing studies have documented accelerated learning when the task is practiced with the addition of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) to the primary motor cortex (M1). However, these studies use the same target to throw at each time. The purpose of this study was to replicate previous work where a-tDCS applied to M1 improved performance of a dart-throwing task quicker than with SHAM stimulation, but to have subjects throw to different targets on the dartboard with each throw.

methodSixty-four healthy subjects practiced a dart-throwing task with their non-dominant arm. On the first visit, the subjects performed a pre- and post-test, as well as a 20-min practice in between, where they were randomized to receive 2 mA a-tDCS over the contralateral M1 to the throwing hand (n = 33) or very brief stimulation (SHAM, n = 31). The subjects repeated testing 1 and 24 h later to test for retention. FINDING: Both groups reduced their endpoint error and the variability in endpoint error (throwing consistency) over time. There were no significant differences between a-tDCS and SHAM conditions in either of these measures.

conclusionUnlike many previous studies, stimulation of M1 with a-tDCS did not accelerate learning of a dart-throwing task when the targets were constantly changed. It is hypothesized that this could have been due to the stimulation intensity being too high and possibly having a counter-regulatory effect on cortical activity, or it could have been due to some other learning mechanism that requires more time and practice to develop when the endpoint or target of the task changes. Alternatively, this task may have benefited from stimulation of the cerebellum, where it is known that motor adaptation can efficiently update and improve movements.

Indexed as

LearningMotor CortexMotor SkillsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40760800
PMCPMC12321951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.