ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Impact Biomechanics Reveal Positional and Session Type Differences in Canadian Collegiate Football.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact Biomechanics Reveal Positional and Session Type Differences in Canadian Collegiate Football.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frequent head impacts are common in Canadian football, yet the biomechanical determinants underlying repeated subconcussive exposure and their potential implications remain poorly characterized. To address this, we investigated the biomechanical impact characteristics of college-level Canadian varsity football players, aiming to elucidate the underlying factors that drive subconcussive impacts. Sixty-four athletes were outfitted with head impact sensors during games, practices, and training camps. We examined impact frequency, peak linear and rotational acceleration, impact duration, area under the acceleration-time curve (AUAC), impulse, and head jerk, grouping participants as small skill (SS), big skill (BS), or linemen (LN). Significant differences emerged based on both player position and session type. Linemen experienced the highest AUAC and impulse values, whereas SS and BS positions were associated with less frequent but higher-magnitude impacts. Session type further influenced exposure, with games producing greater peak accelerations and longer impact durations than practices or training camps. These results demonstrate that analyzing linear acceleration time series reveals more nuanced insights into the complex dynamics of subconcussive impacts than peak magnitudes alone. Such analyses establish a critical foundation for linking biomechanical parameters to injury risk and neurophysiological biomarkers, ultimately informing data-driven strategies to enhance athlete safety in contact sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.