ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
The relationship between clinical subtypes, prognosis, and treatment in ICU patients with acute cholangitis using unsupervised machine learning methods.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of intensive care unit admission rates in patients with acute cholangitis.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute cholangitis (AC) presents with significant clinical heterogeneity, and existing severity classifications have limited prognostic value in critically ill patients. Subtypes of AC in critically ill patients have not been investigated.
objectiveThe study aimed to offer a novel approach to identify clinical subtypes and improve individualized risk assessment and treatment strategies using an unsupervised analysis.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of ICU patients with AC from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database. K-means clustering was applied to 24 routinely available clinical variables from the first 24 h of ICU admission to identify clinical subtypes. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess associations between subtypes, mortality, and biliary drainage strategies. Furthermore, a simplified model using the top five SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) ranked variables (hemoglobin, RDW, albumin, CCI, and sodium) was developed and subsequently validated in an external cohort from MIMIC-III.
resultsTwo distinct subtypes were identified: a mild-inflammatory subtype (n = 451) and an inflammatory-dysfunctional subtype (n = 348). The inflammatory-dysfunctional subtype was characterized by higher levels of RDW, ALP, bilirubin, creatinine, and coagulopathy markers, and exhibited significantly higher 28-day mortality (30.17% vs. 5.32%, p < 0.001). This subtype remained an independent predictor of mortality after multivariable adjustment (HR = 2.38,95%CI:1.42-3.9, p = 0.001). Within the inflammatory-dysfunctional subtype, ERCP was associated with lower mortality (HR = 0.56, p = 0.01), whereas PTCD was associated with higher mortality (HR = 1.63, p = 0.031), potentially reflecting underlying disease severity. The simplified model retained strong discriminative performance (AUC = 0.87) and was successfully validated in the external cohort, confirming the reproducibility and prognostic relevance of the subtypes.
conclusionsWe identified and externally validated two clinically meaningful AC subtypes with distinct prognoses. A simplified model using five readily available variables facilitates clinical application and can support more individualized treatment approaches. These data-driven subtypes offer additional prognostic discrimination beyond the Tokyo Guidelines, serving as a valuable complement to existing severity classifications for guiding precision management of ICU patients with AC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.