Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760715›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Primary care physicians' job satisfaction in eleven Western countries: a cross-sectional study.

Enzo Dattoli, Christine Cohidon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enzo DattoliDepartment of Family Medicine, Center for Primary Care and General Medicine (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. enzo.dattoli@unisante.ch.
Christine CohidonDepartment of Family Medicine, Center for Primary Care and General Medicine (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. christine.cohidon@uninsante.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeJob dissatisfaction and job-related stress among primary care physicians (PCPs) are recognised as major issues in high-income countries.

methodsWe analysed the Commonwealth Fund's 2019 International Health Policy Survey of PCPs (n = 13,200). Job dissatisfaction was examined with regard to its potential determinants, including job-related stress, satisfaction with income, time spent with patients, workloads and administrative tasks. We also analysed the future possible consequences of dissatisfaction. We examined outcomes by sex, age and practice location.

resultsProportions of PCPs 'extremely' or 'very satisfied' with their job varied from 33% (France) to 69% (Switzerland). There were strong correlations between PCP job satisfaction and dissatisfaction with salary (OR = 2.64; 95%CI: 2.35-2.96), workload (OR = 2.80; 95%CI: 2.20-3.57) and time spent with patients (OR = 1.91; 95%CI: 1.58-2.31). 47% of physicians did not want to reduce their working hours; 84% did not yet want to retire from work fully (more than 23% after 55 and more than 57% after 65 would like to retire).

conclusionsMost PCPs were satisfied with their jobs. Although the variables studied could not explain some of the differences observed, this study's results could suggest policy avenues for improving PCPs' job satisfaction (e.g. more inter-professional work; rebalancing different specialists' salaries).

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionPhysicians, Primary CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational StressSalaries and Fringe BenefitsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadAdministrative tasksIncomeJob satisfactionJob stressPrimary care physiciansRetirementStaff turnoverWorkload

Identifiers

PMID40760715
PMCPMC12323230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.