Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760697›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025

Visualizations of autoregulatory insults in moderate-to-severe paediatric traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis from the multicentre STARSHIP trial.

Teodor Svedung Wettervik, Claudia Ann Smith, Anders Hånell, Stefan Yu Bögli, Peter Hutchinson, Shruti Agrawal, Peter Smielewski, STARSHIP study team

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Teodor Svedung WettervikDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. teodor.svedung-wettervik@neuro.uu.se.
Claudia Ann SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anders HånellDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan Yu BögliDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter HutchinsonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Shruti Agrawal *Department of Paediatrics, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Peter Smielewski *Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
STARSHIP study team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a heterogeneous condition with age-dependent differences in systemic and cerebral physiology, making cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) challenging to target. Monitoring cerebral autoregulation using the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and deriving an autoregulatory optimal CPP (CPPopt) may personalize treatment, but evidence in children remains limited. In this multicentre paediatric TBI study, we aimed to explore and visualize PRx and CPPopt in relation to outcome.

methodsIn this secondary analysis of the prospective, multicentre study (STARSHIP), 98 paediatric TBI patients (1-16 years) from 10 paediatric intensive care units, in the UK, between 2018 and 2023, with high-frequency physiological data and 12-month GOS-E Peds outcomes, not treated with decompressive craniectomy, were included. Intracranial pressure (ICP), PRx, CPP, and ΔCPPopt were correlated with outcome using insult intensity/duration heatmaps across the full monitoring period. Two-variable heatmaps incorporating PRx were also used to assess how autoregulation modified the relationship between ICP, CPP, and ΔCPPopt with outcome.

resultsThere was a transition from favourable to unfavourable outcome when PRx exceeded + 0.00 for longer episodes. Furthermore, there was a transition towards worse outcome when CPP went below 40 mmHg and above 100 mmHg for sustained durations. For ΔCPPopt, the transition towards poor prognosis occurred for values below - 20 mmHg, but positive ΔCPPopt was tolerated. In the two-variable heatmaps, PRx above + 0.50 together with ICP above 20 mmHg, CPP below 60 mmHg, or negative ΔCPPopt were particularly associated with unfavourable outcome.

conclusionsThis novel study visualized the safe and dangerous intervals for PRx and CPPopt as well as the interaction effect between the autoregulatory status and ICP, CPP, and ΔCPPopt in relation to outcome in paediatric TBI. Future prospective trials are needed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of PRx/CPPopt guided management.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticHomeostasisAdolescentCerebrovascular CirculationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricIntracranial PressureMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective StudiesUnited KingdomCerebral autoregulationOptimal cerebral perfusion pressureOutcomePaediatricPressure reactivity indexTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40760697
PMCPMC12323160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.