ArticlePneumonia (Nathan Qld.)2025
Microbial profiling of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comprehensive molecular diagnostics study.
Article in Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) causes substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study compares the microbial detections in CAP patients with and without COPD using culture based and molecular diagnostic methods.
methodsThis prospective study included 412 hospitalized pneumonia patients (136 with COPD). Lower respiratory tract samples were analysed with traditional cultures and a multiplex PCR panel (FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus). Multivariable Poisson regression identified predictors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection, and logistic regression estimated detection probability using the top predictors.
resultsOverall pathogen detection rates were similar between groups, but P. aeruginosa was significantly more common in COPD patients (12.5% vs. 3.1%; p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, each additional year of age increased the risk of P. aeruginosa by 5% (RR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09), while advanced COPD (GOLD 3-4) conferred a four-fold higher risk (RR 4.29; 95% CI 1.94-9.46), diabetes mellitus a four-fold risk (RR 4.04; 95% CI 1.97-8.29), and prior P. aeruginosa detection a five-fold risk (RR 5.03; 95% CI 2.44-10.36). Inhaler use, bronchiectasis, and recent hospitalization were not independently associated.
conclusionAlthough overall microbial detection rates were comparable between groups, P. aeruginosa was disproportionately prevalent in high-risk COPD individuals. While most COPD patients with pneumonia can be managed with standard empirical antibiotics, empirical coverage for P. aeruginosa should be considered for selected high-risk patients. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate targeted P. aeruginosa coverage to optimize antibiotic stewardship and improve outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.