Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760670›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2025

Comparative performance of Kato-Katz, POC-CCA and real-time PCR in detecting Schistosoma mansoni infection at different endemicity settings in northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Getaneh Alemu, Endalkachew Nibret, Abaineh Munshea, Melaku Anegagrie, María Flores-Chávez, Tadesse Hailu, Arancha Amor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Long-term persistence ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Prevalence ofEnvironmental health insights · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Getaneh AlemuDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, PO.BOX: 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. getanehmlt@gmail.com.
Endalkachew NibretBiology Department, Science College, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Abaineh MunsheaBiology Department, Science College, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Melaku AnegagrieMundo Sano Foundation and Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María Flores-ChávezReference and Research Laboratory in Parasitology. National Center for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Tadesse HailuDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, PO.BOX: 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Arancha AmorMundo Sano Foundation and Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective detection of Schistosoma mansoni is crucial for the control and management of the infection. This study aimed to evaluate the field performance of three diagnostic methods-point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) assay, Kato-Katz (KK) technique, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-for detecting S. mansoni infection in different transmission settings across northwest Ethiopia.

methodsFrom February to June 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the Amhara Regional State of Ethiopia, involving 1192 randomly selected participants. Stool samples were analyzed using the KK technique and RT-PCR, while urine samples were tested using the POC-CCA cassette. The performance of POC-CCA and RT-PCR was evaluated against a KK reference standard across varying transmission areas. In addition, diagnostic accuracy for all three methods was assessed using latent class analysis (LCA) with Mplus software. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa statistics were calculated using the Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (SISA) online tool.

resultsThe KK method showed the lowest prevalence (33.4%) and demonstrated reduced sensitivity, particularly in low (54.6%) and moderate (67.0%) transmission areas, though it performed better (88.6%) in high-endemic settings compared to LCA reference. In contrast, the POC-CCA test showed higher prevalence (53.5%) and consistently high sensitivity (93.4-100%) across transmission settings, although its specificity declined in low (86.0%) and moderate (78.9%) endemic areas against LCA. Compared to the KK gold standard, POC-CCA had high sensitivity (93.5%) and NPV (95.3%) but lower specificity (62.5%) and moderate agreement (kappa = 0.52). RT-PCR exhibited strong diagnostic performance, with high sensitivity against both KK (93.5%) and LCA (97.2%) but declining specificity as endemicity increased (84.2% in low, 79.4% in moderate and 28.0% in high-endemic areas), and showed substantial agreement with LCA (kappa = 0.75).

conclusionsThe KK demonstrates low sensitivity, particularly in low-transmission settings. Both the POC-CCA test and RT-PCR show good performance for detecting S. mansoni infection. However, due to its complexity and resource requirements, RT-PCR is not feasible for routine field use. Therefore, we recommend the adoption of the POC-CCA test in Ethiopia's SCH control and elimination programs.

Indexed as

EthiopiaKKPerformancePOC-CCART- PCRSchistosoma mansoni

Identifiers

PMID40760670
PMCPMC12323140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.