Observational studyMedicine2025
Effectiveness of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis and 5-aminosalicylate intolerance.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) intolerance complicates ulcerative colitis (UC) management, often necessitating alternative treatment approaches. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) has been recognized as a safe treatment option for patients with UC who are refractory or intolerant to conventional drugs, including steroids; however, its effectiveness and safety in patients with 5-ASA intolerance remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of GMA in patients with UC and 5-ASA intolerance. We conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GMA in patients with UC and 5-ASA intolerance. Eighty-five patients with UC who underwent GMA were assessed, including 21 with 5-ASA intolerance and 64 with 5-ASA tolerance. This study compared the patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, concomitant drugs, and adverse events between the 2 groups. The remission rate was 28.6% (6/21) in the 5-ASA-intolerant group and 31.3% (20/64) in the 5-ASA-tolerant group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .967). Both groups showed significant reductions in the dose of oral prednisolone and Lichtiger clinical activity index scores following the GMA. Our study suggests that GMA is equally effective and safe in 5-ASA-intolerant and 5-ASA-tolerant patients, offering an alternative treatment option in this challenging clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.