ArticleBMC neurology2025
Efficacy of early rituximab treatment in anti-mGluR1 encephalitis: a case report.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics of Japanese Cases of Anti-Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Type 1 Antibody-Associated Cerebellar Ataxia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Anti-mGluR encephalitis: case series and literature review.BMC neurology · 2026Review
- Case Report: A case of anti-mGluR1 antibody-associated encephalitis treated with efgartigimod combined with rituximab.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-mGluR1 encephalitis is a form of autoimmune encephalitis, with limited reports globally and only two cases reported from Japan. There are uncertainties regarding the optimal immunosuppressive agents and individual drug responses. Herein, we report a case of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis from Japan, notable for a favorable outcome after an early rituximab initiation and an observed increase in cerebellar blood flow during the early disease stages. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 65-year-old woman who experienced dizziness for 3 months, followed by worsening gait instability. She was referred to our department due to progressive difficulty standing and walking. Neurological examination revealed dysarthria, severe cerebellar ataxia, and impaired performance on the finger-to-nose and knee-to-heel tests. Blood tests were negative for rheumatologic autoantibodies, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed a cell count of 4/µL and a protein level of 40.0 mg/dL. However, the IgG index was elevated at 1.35, and oligoclonal bands were positive. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed no abnormalities, but ¹²³I-iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography revealed mild hyperperfusion in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres. Based on the clinical presentation, immune-mediated cerebellar ataxia was suspected. The patient was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, oral prednisolone, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Further diagnostic testing using tissue- and cell-based assays detected mGluR1 antibodies in pretreatment serum and CSF, confirming the diagnosis of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis. As the initial treatment was insufficient, rituximab was administered, leading to significant improvement, including the ability to walk unaided. At the most recent follow-up, >6 months postonset, she showed no symptom progression or cerebellar atrophy.
conclusionsWe experienced a case of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis with increased cerebellar blood flow, where early RTX administration led to a favorable outcome. Its early use, as an acute treatment and for maintenance, may help prevent recurrence and contribute to a positive prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.