Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760470›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Transcriptomic analysis of the interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes S85, Selenomonas ruminantium PC18 and a live yeast strain used as a ruminant feed additive.

Pauline Desvignes, Philippe Ruiz, Laurie Guillot, Jeanne Danon, Alexandra Durand, Martin Beaumont, Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand, Evelyne Forano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pauline DesvignesINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 454 Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Et Santé, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Philippe RuizINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 454 Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Et Santé, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Laurie GuillotINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 454 Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Et Santé, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Jeanne DanonINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 454 Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Et Santé, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Alexandra DurandINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 454 Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Et Santé, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Martin BeaumontINRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, UMR 1289 GenPhySE, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Frédérique Chaucheyras-DurandINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 454 Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Et Santé, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Evelyne ForanoINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 454 Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Et Santé, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France. evelyne.forano@inrae.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobes inhabiting the rumen convert fibrous plant material into usable energy for the host ruminant through a sophisticated network of microbial interactions. Metabolite crossfeeding is considered a key feature of the rumen microbiome, enhancing its stability, productivity, and efficiency in degrading plant material. This study analysed in vitro the metabolic interactions between two key rumen bacteria: the cellulolytic bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and the saccharolytic bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium PC18. Additionally, the impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 on their metabolism and interactions was investigated. This strain is used as a feed additive for ruminants.

resultsBacteria were cultured on either cellobiose or cellulose as carbon substrates. Interactions were studied through RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis of various microbial combinations, alongside substrate consumption and metabolite production measurements. The results revealed crossfeeding between F. succinogenes and S. ruminantium, as well as a significant upregulation of numerous F. succinogenes CAZyme genes in response to cellulose. The presence of the yeast strain under the different culture conditions induced metabolic and gene expression changes in both F. succinogenes and S. ruminantium. Notably, no lactate was detected when the yeast was added to S. ruminantium cultures or cocultures. Furthermore, the presence of bacteria influences yeast metabolism and crossfeeding between bacteria and yeast was suggested.

conclusionsThe findings provide deeper insight into the in vitro interactions between F. succinogenes, S. ruminantium and S. cerevisiae, highlighting possible modes of action that may explain some of the observed positive effects of yeast on rumen function in vivo. This study underscores the mutual interactions between rumen bacteria and live yeast.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFibrobacterGene Expression ProfilingMicrobial InteractionsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSelenomonasTranscriptomeAnimalsCellobioseCelluloseRumenCellobioseCelluloseFibrobacter succinogenesMicrobial interactionsRNA-seqSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSelenomonas ruminantium

Identifiers

PMID40760470
PMCPMC12323243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.