ArticleBMC cancer2025
Evaluation of pre-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT according to Mandard classification in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of histological response by PET-CT after 2 weeks of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a prospective clinical trial.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- BaselineAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical utility and future directions of FDG-PET in rectal cancer management.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- Divergent Prognostic Value of Primary Tumor Segmentation Metrics on Baseline FDG PET/CT in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study primarily aimed to assess whether baseline [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT metabolic parameters-including SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)-can predict tumor regression grade (TRG) and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). In addition, secondary analyses were performed to identify other clinical and pathological variables associated with treatment response and prognosis.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients diagnosed with LARC who underwent nCRT followed by surgical resection between 2014 and 2023. Pre-treatment staging with F-18 FDG PET/CT was performed for all patients. Postoperative pathological response was assessed using the TRG system. Patients were categorized into two groups: complete responders (TRG1) and incomplete responders (TRG2-5). Demographic characteristics, PET/CT metabolic parameters (SUVmax, MTV, TLG), Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9 (CA19-9), and histopathological features (perforation, lymphovascular invasion [LVI], and perineural invasion [PNI]) were compared between the groups. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, logistic regression models with odds ratios (ORs), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
resultsA total of 151 patients were included. A statistically significant difference was found between TRG1 and TRG2-5 groups regarding family history (p = 0.034), CEA at diagnosis (p = 0.002), Ca19.9 after radiotherapy (p = 0.045), and presence of concurrent chemotherapy (CC) (p = 0.004). Significant differences were also observed in postoperative pathological features, including perforation (p = 0.045), LVI (p = 0.023), PNI (p = 0.031), and post-operative CEA levels (p = 0.001). In terms of outcomes, TRG1 was associated with better survival (p = 0.001), longer disease-free survival (p = 0.001), and overall survival (p = 0.001). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of complete response (TRG1): family history (OR: 5.08, p = 0.027), post-RT CEA (OR: 0.61, p = 0.015), post-op CEA (OR: 1.13, p = 0.012), perforation (OR: 20.93, p = 0.033), LVI (OR: 0.33, p = 0.042), and PNI (OR: 0.49, p = 0.045). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly longer overall survival in patients with TRG1 compared to TRG2-5 (log-rank p = 0.001). Similarly, disease-free survival was significantly better in the TRG1 group (log-rank p = 0.001). In the multivariate Cox regression model, TRG1 (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26-0.66; p = 0.001), CC (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98; p = 0.039), and absence of perforation (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.95; p = 0.034) were found to be independent predictors of improved survival.
conclusionsBaseline F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters, including SUVmax, MTV, and TLG, were not predictive of TRG or survival in patients with LARC undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, clinical and pathological variables such as family history, post-treatment CEA levels, perforation, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion were significantly associated with TRG1. TRG1, histopathological subtype, perforation, and CC were also found to be independent predictors of survival. These findings suggest that while FDG-PET/CT may have limited utility in predicting treatment response, certain clinical and pathological features remain critical for outcome assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.