Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760415›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025

A randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma.

Yunying Feng, Yuelun Zhang, Wei Lian, Yang Xue, Manjiao Ma, Xuerong Yu, Xiaopeng Guo, Lulu Ma, Bing Xing, Yuguang Huang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05822817 (A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Effect of Sevoflurane and Propofol for Maintenance of Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery After Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05822817 phase4completednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Effect of Sevoflurane and Propofol for Maintenance of Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery After Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled252ConditionsPituitary AdenomaArmssevoflurane, propofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yunying FengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-1846
Yuelun ZhangInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7990-9003
Wei LianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-7296
Yang XueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Manjiao MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-3492
Xuerong YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4411-0679
Xiaopeng GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-5560
Lulu MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. malulu@pumch.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-6862
Bing XingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. xingbingemail@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-5168
Yuguang HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9278-6316

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of inhalation anesthesia as compared with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma have not been well studied.

methodsThis randomized clinical trial enrolled patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery between May 2023 to April 2024. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive inhalation anesthesia or TIVA. The primary endpoint was the 15-item Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-15) score on the first postoperative day. Secondary endpoints included postoperative anesthesia recovery patterns, neuroendocrine stress responses, cellular immune responses, and recovery quality. Subgroup analyses were also conducted for the postoperative QoR-15 scores and neuroendocrine stress responses. Potential influence factors for QoR-15 scores and changes in counts of lymphocytes were explored.

resultsA total of 252 patients were randomized. No significant difference in postoperative QoR-15 scores was observed between groups and the between-group difference was well below the minimal clinically important difference (median difference 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]- 4.0 to 5.0, P = 0.647). Compared with the inhalation group, the TIVA group exhibited significantly lower Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) score and reduced antiemetic drug use in the postanesthesia care unit. Subgroup analyses for postoperative QoR-15 scores revealed no significant interactions. Adrenocorticotropic hormone levels on postoperative day 1 were lower in the inhalation group, while thyroxine and serum free thyroxine levels were higher. No significant differences in these neuroendocrine indices were found in postoperative month 3. Lymphocyte subset levels did not differ between groups on postoperative day 1, although perioperative changes in immune cell counts were correlated with patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

conclusionBoth anesthesia methods resulted in comparable short-term postoperative recovery quality as measured by the QoR-15 scores. TIVA was associated with smoother anesthesia recovery and lower immediate antiemetic requirements. Differences in early neuroendocrine responses were observed but did not persist at 3 months postoperatively.

trial registrationThe trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov platform (registration number: NCT05822817; date of registration: March 13, 2023).

Indexed as

AdenomaAnesthesia Recovery PeriodAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousPituitary NeoplasmsPropofolSevofluraneAdultAnesthesia, IntravenousFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolSevofluraneInhalation anesthesiaPituitary adenomaPostoperative recovery qualityTotal intravenous anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40760415
PMCPMC12323008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.