Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
A randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05822817 (A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Effect of Sevoflurane and Propofol for Maintenance of Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery After Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Effect of Sevoflurane and Propofol for Maintenance of Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery After Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Monitored Anesthesia Care with Target-Controlled Infusion and Sevoflurane Mask Anesthesia for Outpatient Gynecologic Surgery: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Comparative evaluation of total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia on postoperative recovery in elective abdominal surgery.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effects of inhalation anesthesia as compared with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma have not been well studied.
methodsThis randomized clinical trial enrolled patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery between May 2023 to April 2024. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive inhalation anesthesia or TIVA. The primary endpoint was the 15-item Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-15) score on the first postoperative day. Secondary endpoints included postoperative anesthesia recovery patterns, neuroendocrine stress responses, cellular immune responses, and recovery quality. Subgroup analyses were also conducted for the postoperative QoR-15 scores and neuroendocrine stress responses. Potential influence factors for QoR-15 scores and changes in counts of lymphocytes were explored.
resultsA total of 252 patients were randomized. No significant difference in postoperative QoR-15 scores was observed between groups and the between-group difference was well below the minimal clinically important difference (median difference 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]- 4.0 to 5.0, P = 0.647). Compared with the inhalation group, the TIVA group exhibited significantly lower Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) score and reduced antiemetic drug use in the postanesthesia care unit. Subgroup analyses for postoperative QoR-15 scores revealed no significant interactions. Adrenocorticotropic hormone levels on postoperative day 1 were lower in the inhalation group, while thyroxine and serum free thyroxine levels were higher. No significant differences in these neuroendocrine indices were found in postoperative month 3. Lymphocyte subset levels did not differ between groups on postoperative day 1, although perioperative changes in immune cell counts were correlated with patient demographic and clinical characteristics.
conclusionBoth anesthesia methods resulted in comparable short-term postoperative recovery quality as measured by the QoR-15 scores. TIVA was associated with smoother anesthesia recovery and lower immediate antiemetic requirements. Differences in early neuroendocrine responses were observed but did not persist at 3 months postoperatively.
trial registrationThe trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov platform (registration number: NCT05822817; date of registration: March 13, 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.