Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760408›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Open-radiomics: a collection of standardized datasets and a technical protocol for reproducible radiomics machine learning pipelines.

Khashayar Namdar, Matthias W Wagner, Birgit B Ertl-Wagner, Farzad Khalvati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khashayar NamdarDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Matthias W WagnerDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Birgit B Ertl-WagnerDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Farzad KhalvatiDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada. farzad.khalvati@utoronto.ca.

Funding

CIHR 184015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs an important branch of machine learning pipelines in medical imaging, radiomics faces two major challenges namely reproducibility and accessibility. In this work, we introduce open-radiomics, a set of radiomics datasets along with a comprehensive radiomics pipeline based on our proposed technical protocol to investigate the effects of radiomics feature extraction on the reproducibility of the results.

methodsWe curated large-scale radiomics datasets based on three open-source datasets; BraTS 2020 for high-grade glioma (HGG) versus low-grade glioma (LGG) classification and survival analysis, BraTS 2023 for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) classification, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival analysis from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). We used the BraTS 2020 open-source Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) dataset to demonstrate how our proposed technical protocol could be utilized in radiomics-based studies. The cohort includes 369 adult patients with brain tumors (76 LGG, and 293 HGG). Using PyRadiomics library for LGG vs. HGG classification, we created 288 radiomics datasets; the combinations of 4 MRI sequences, 3 binWidths, 6 image normalization methods, and 4 tumor subregions. We used Random Forest classifiers, and for each radiomics dataset, we repeated the training-validation-test (60%/20%/20%) experiment with different data splits and model random states 100 times (28,800 test results) and calculated the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC).

resultsUnlike binWidth and image normalization, the tumor subregion and imaging sequence significantly affected performance of the models. T1 contrast-enhanced sequence and the union of Necrotic and the non-enhancing tumor core subregions resulted in the highest AUROCs (average test AUROC 0.951, 95% confidence interval of (0.949, 0.952)). Although several settings and data splits (28 out of 28800) yielded test AUROC of 1, they were irreproducible.

conclusionsOur experiments demonstrate the sources of variability in radiomics pipelines (e.g., tumor subregion) can have a significant impact on the results, which may lead to superficial perfect performances that are irreproducible. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsSurvival AnalysisBrain cancerDatasetOpen-sourceRadiomicsReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID40760408
PMCPMC12323200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.