ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
A computational eye state classification model using EEG signal based on data mining techniques: comparative analysis.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence has shown great promise in healthcare, particularly in non-invasive diagnostics using bio signals. This study focuses on classifying eye states (open or closed) using Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals captured via a 14-electrode neuroheadset, recorded through a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). A publicly available dataset comprising 14,980 instances was used, where each sample represents EEG signals corresponding to eye activity. Fourteen classical machine learning (ML) models were evaluated using a tenfold cross-validation approach. The preprocessing pipeline involved removing outliers using the Z-score method, addressing class imbalance with SMOTETomek, and applying a bandpass filter to reduce signal noise. Significant EEG features were selected using a two-sample independent t-test (p < 0.05), ensuring only statistically relevant electrodes were retained. Additionally, the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) method was used for feature extraction to enhance class separability by maximizing variance differences between eye states. Experimental results demonstrate that several classifiers achieved strong performance, with accuracy above 90%. The k-Nearest Neighbours classifier yielded the highest accuracy of 97.92% with CSP, and 97.75% without CSP. The application of CSP also enhanced the performance of Multi-Layer Perceptron and Support Vector Machine, reaching accuracies of 95.30% and 93.93%, respectively. The results affirm that integrating statistical validation, signal processing, and ML techniques can enable accurate and efficient EEG-based eye state classification, with practical implications for real-time BCI systems and offering a lightweight solution for real-time healthcare wearable applications healthcare applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40760397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.