ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
The state of the art in artificial intelligence and digital pathology in prostate cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- A guide for the deployment, validation, and accreditation of clinical digital pathology tools.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Generalizability of a biopsy-trained artificial intelligence algorithm to TURP and HoLEP specimens for detection of incidental prostate adenocarcinoma.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Evaluation of Biological Techniques.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinically oriented immune heterogeneity in prostate cancer: emerging targets and strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Angular threshold for intraocular pressure elevation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Trendelenburg position.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer is among the most common cancers worldwide, with ~1.5 million new diagnoses globally every year. The sheer mass of data becoming available on prostate cancer, as well as other types of cancer, is increasing exponentially. The growth of digital pathology has particularly sparked interest in developing artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to data synthesis to predict cancer grade and outcomes in men with prostate cancer. Progress has been made in this field, particularly in applications for diagnosis, prognosis and inferring molecular alterations, but several challenges remain. Variability in tissue processing and scanning contribute to dataset heterogeneity. The absence of well-annotated, multi-institutional databases hinders AI model development and generalization of model performances across clinical settings. Regulatory frameworks for AI-driven diagnostics remain nascent. Moreover, bias in training datasets skewing against under-represented demographic groups poses a fundamental challenge to developing equitable models. By mapping contemporary evidence around each of these hurdles and identifying tangible interventions, we can advance AI-augmented digital pathology towards reliable and generalizable tools to improve prostate cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40760335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.