ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
Nationwide analysis of surgical and interventional uterine fibroid treatments over the past decades in Germany.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Large Language Models in the Promotion of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiologic Methods in Gynecology and Obstetrics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUterine artery embolization (UAE) has been a valid tool in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids for a quarter of a century by now. This study aims to examine the impact of this treatment and its development since its introduction in Germany. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll patients that received inpatient treatment for uterine fibroids (ICD-10 code D25) as primary diagnosis or the primary symptoms of hypermenorrhea/menorrhagia (N92) or dysmenorrhea (N94) with a secondary diagnosis of uterine fibroids from 2005 until 2023 were included. The data was obtained from the research data center of the German Federal Statistical Office. Basic demographic data and all encoded diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were collected and analyzed. Special focus laid on patients receiving either of the three invasive treatments: hysterectomy (HE), myomectomy (ME), and uterine artery embolization (UAE).
resultsOne million one hundred sixty-four thousand five hundred sixty-six women were hospitalized in those 19 years with 91.7% receiving either HE, ME or UAE. There was a continuous decline in annual numbers of hospitalizations (-47.7%) and of HE (-55.5%) between 2005 and 2023. Constantly more than 99% of the treated women underwent surgery-contribution of UAE continuously remained below 1%. The highest number of UAE was conducted in 2012 with 568 treated women, followed by a continuous decline to 313 in 2023. The reference population of all women at the age of 30 to < 55 years in Germany decreased only slightly from 15,230,000 to 13,506,000 (-11.3%).
conclusionThe numbers of inpatient invasive treatment continuously declined disproportionately to the demographic development. Despite excellent evidence, UAE is not used for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids to a relevant extent in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.