Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760265›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

In Silico Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Dataset for the Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models in Tumor Segmentation.

Cristina Alfaro Vergara, Nicolás Araya Caro, Domingo Mery Quiroz, Claudia Prieto Vasquez

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristina Alfaro VergaraDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile. calfarov@academicos.uta.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7532-6302
Nicolás Araya CaroDepartment of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4560-7286
Domingo Mery QuirozDepartment of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4748-3882
Claudia Prieto VasquezMillennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering i-Health, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-2523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scarcity of publicly available digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) datasets significantly limits the development of robust deep learning (DL) models for breast tumor segmentation. In this exploratory proof-of-concept study, we assess the viability of in silico-generated DBT data as a training source for tumor segmentation. A dataset of 230 two-dimensional (2D) regions of interest (ROIs) derived from FDA-cleared software and encompassing a spectrum of breast densities and tumor complexities, was used to train 13 DL models, including U-Net, FCN, DeepLabv3, and DeepLabv3 + architectures. Each model was trained either from scratch or fine-tuned using COCO-pretrained weights (ResNet50/101 backbones). Performance was evaluated using F1-score, intersection over union (IoU), precision, and recall. Among all models, U-Net trained from scratch and DeepLabv3 + fine-tuned with ResNet50 achieved the highest and most consistent results (F1-scores of 82.52% and 84.98%, and per-image IoUs of 78.49% and 83.77%, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and post hoc Bonferroni correction (α > 0.0042). To evaluate generalization across domains, the baseline U-Net model was retrained from scratch on a hybrid dataset combining in silico and real-world DBT ROIs, yielding promising results (F1-score of 79%). Despite the domain shift, these findings support the utility of in silico DBT as a complementary resource for training and benchmarking DL models, particularly in data-limited environments. This study provides foundational experimental evidence for integrating computationally generated in silico data into AI-based DBT tumor segmentation research workflows.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationDatasets as TopicDeep LearningMammographyFemaleHumansProof of Concept StudyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBreast tumor segmentationDeep learning U-NetDigital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)Hybrid trainingIn silico data

Identifiers

PMID40760265
PMCPMC13103193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.