ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
In Silico Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Dataset for the Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models in Tumor Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthetic-to-Clinical Ensemble Learning for Volumetric Breast Tumor Segmentation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Under Limited Annotated Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scarcity of publicly available digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) datasets significantly limits the development of robust deep learning (DL) models for breast tumor segmentation. In this exploratory proof-of-concept study, we assess the viability of in silico-generated DBT data as a training source for tumor segmentation. A dataset of 230 two-dimensional (2D) regions of interest (ROIs) derived from FDA-cleared software and encompassing a spectrum of breast densities and tumor complexities, was used to train 13 DL models, including U-Net, FCN, DeepLabv3, and DeepLabv3 + architectures. Each model was trained either from scratch or fine-tuned using COCO-pretrained weights (ResNet50/101 backbones). Performance was evaluated using F1-score, intersection over union (IoU), precision, and recall. Among all models, U-Net trained from scratch and DeepLabv3 + fine-tuned with ResNet50 achieved the highest and most consistent results (F1-scores of 82.52% and 84.98%, and per-image IoUs of 78.49% and 83.77%, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and post hoc Bonferroni correction (α > 0.0042). To evaluate generalization across domains, the baseline U-Net model was retrained from scratch on a hybrid dataset combining in silico and real-world DBT ROIs, yielding promising results (F1-score of 79%). Despite the domain shift, these findings support the utility of in silico DBT as a complementary resource for training and benchmarking DL models, particularly in data-limited environments. This study provides foundational experimental evidence for integrating computationally generated in silico data into AI-based DBT tumor segmentation research workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.