ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2025
Bare Metal Stenting for Residual Arch Dissections: A Computational Analysis.
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrograde aortic endograft side-branch design is associated with delayed cervical branch filling: A fluid mechanics scaling analysis.JVS-vascular science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeType A Thoracic Aortic Dissections are a highly morbid and complex clinical challenge often managed with hemiarch or total arch repair. Hemiarch repair is more commonly performed due to improved neurologic morbidity profile however it leaves behind a residual dissection flap which can lead to aneurysmal degeneration. Bare metal stent placement in conjunction with hemiarch repair is a novel technique which can theoretically avoid leaving a residual dissection flap. In this paper we analyze the biomechanical changes observed after in silico deployment of a bare metal stent in a post-hemiarch type A aortic dissection.
methodsWe obtain computed tomography scans from pre-operative bare metal stent patients and perform high-fidelity segmentations. This geometry is then utilized for in silico stent deployment via finite element analysis. Deformed geometries are then utilized for computational fluid dynamic simulations to analyze the evolution of pressure gradients in the aorta.
resultsWe analyze the resulting geometry from in silico stent deployment for three different stiffness ratios between the flap and aortic wall. We demonstrate an acceptable stress evolution in the stent across all 3 stiffness configurations. We show a reduction in the false luminal volume across all stiffness ratios. Our analysis of pressure distributions that evolve in the aorta show that even in scenarios of high flap stiffness, where the false lumen volume shrinks correspondingly less, we still achieve a reduction in the pressure gradient across the aorta.
conclusionWe show that bare metal stent deployment hemodynamically stabilizes the aorta via our finite element analysis and subsequent computational fluid dynamic modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.