Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760191›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Comparison of free-hand technique and patient-specific guiding template for pedicle screws positioning in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using neurophysiological monitoring.

Massimo Girardo, Federico Fusini, Domenico Messina, Giosuè Gargiulo, Pasquale Cinnella, Silvia Amico, Paolo Costa

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Massimo GirardoSpine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Federico FusiniSpine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Domenico MessinaSpine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Giosuè GargiuloSpine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Pasquale CinnellaSpine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Silvia AmicoSpine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy. s.amico@pm.univpm.it.
Paolo CostaFormer Director of Section of Clinical Neurophisiology Dept of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScrews mispositioning is an identifiable cause of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring changes. To prevent screw mispositioning, a patient-specific guiding template for pedicle screw positioning (PSGT) was introduced to avoid implant mispositioning. The study aims to compare the changes in neurophysiological monitoring and screw mispositioning between free-hand (FH) and PSGT in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients treated between January 2016 and December 2021 for AIS surgery, aged 14 to 20, were included in the study. Patients with syndromic, kyphoscoliosis, or neuromuscular scoliosis were excluded from the study. Screws were positioned either with FH or PSGT technique. During and after screws' positioning, holes and screws were tested with neurophysiological monitoring in both cases. All screw misplacements were recorded. Screws misplacements were analyzed with rate, and the comparison between groups was performed through Fisher's exact test.

resultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 83 (19 males and 64 females) patients with AIS were included. Some neurophysiological changes were reported in 16.9% of patients (13 transitory, 1 persistent). In 20% of patients treated with the FH technique, some alterations were reported (9 transitory, 1 persistent), while in the PSGT group, alterations were reported in 12% of cases (4 transitory). In 75% of cases, screw mispositioning was recorded in the concavity. No significant differences were observed between groups (p = 0.428).

conclusionsScrews mispositioning is one of the significant risks in AIS surgery, and the use of PSGT reduces the incidence of screws mispositioning and neurophysiological changes. However, some alterations were also observed when pedicle screws were implanted with PSGT. Neurophysiological monitoring is essential for verifying screw mispositioning, regardless of the surgical technique employed.

Indexed as

Intraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringPedicle ScrewsScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAdolescent scoliosisDrilling templateFree-handNeurophysiological monitoringPatient-specific guiding templatePedicle screw

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.