ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Identifying the vulnerable among the vulnerable: applying quantitative intersectionality methods to assess potential inequities in the HIV continuum of care for people living with schizophrenia in the united States.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with schizophrenia face disproportionate risk of HIV, yet HIV testing remains low. Differential testing rates and engagement in care may be impacted by compounding social marginalization, partly linked to structural barriers. Grounded in intersectionality, we set out to identify the riskiest intersectional positions for HIV testing and engagement in HIV care in the United States.
methodsWe created a retrospective cohort of people living with schizophrenia and matched controls, using 2012 national Medicaid claims data. We coded intersectional positions based on schizophrenia diagnosis, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) models to assess intersectional effects for two outcomes, HIV testing and retention in HIV care (RIC) defined as ≥2 CD4 or HIV viral load tests ≥90 days apart.
resultsOf 777,887 patients in the testing cohort, 7.7% tested for HIV; 39% of the 17,913 patients in the RIC cohort were retained in care. In MAIHDA models without fixed effects, intersectional positions explained 12.7% of the variance in HIV testing and 7.4% of the variance in RIC. In final models including fixed and random effects, intersectional positions accounted for 1.4% of the variance in HIV testing and 0.8% of the variance in RIC. Older Black men with schizophrenia had lower-than-expected RIC prevalence in final models.
conclusionIntersectional MAIHDA models can identify both vulnerable and resilient intersectional positions. The antagonistic intersectional effects for older Black men with schizophrenia highlight the need for targeted interventions to address structural barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.