ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
Empiric stereotactic body radiotherapy for presumed early-stage lung cancer : Pulmonary function changes, treatment-related toxicity and survival outcome.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes and patterns of failure after empiric SBRT for presumed early-stage lung tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to demographic shifts, the population is aging, and patients are experiencing more comorbidities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers high rates of local control for patients with medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, obtaining histopathological confirmation can be challenging due to severe comorbidities, small tumors, or unfavorable anatomical locations.
methodsBetween 2011 and 2022, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent lung SBRT for presumed early-stage NSCLC at our institution. Out of 486 consecutive patients treated during this period, 56 patients (11.5%) with a total of 61 lesions were identified and included in this retrospective study. All included patients lacked histopathological confirmation prior to treatment and had no evidence of other active malignancies. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate pulmonary function tests before and after SBRT, including long-term follow-up.
resultsThe median overall survival (OS) after empiric SBRT was 50.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.8-88.7). Survival rates at 1 year and 2 years were 88.4 and 71.1%, respectively. The 1‑, 2‑ and 3‑year local control rates were 96.6%, 92.3% and 87.1%. Pulmonary function tests indicated a relative increase in the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 0.55% (SD 13.5) and 2.0% (SD: 20.0) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. In contrast, the mean diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) showed a relative decline of 7.4% (SD 16.6) and 6.3% (SD 26.1) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Patients with lower comorbidity scores (CCI ≤ 5) exhibited significantly improved OS (p = 0.011). Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) prior to SBRT was associated with shorter OS (p = 0.02) and a relatively high incidence of grade 2-3 pulmonary disorders. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was identified as a possible risk factor for severe treatment-related toxicity. Notably, all patients who experienced grade 3 pulmonary disorders required LTOT before SBRT.
conclusionEmpiric SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for presumed early-stage NSCLC in patients without histopathological confirmation. Even in patients requiring oxygen therapy and with severe comorbidities, long-term survival is feasible with acceptable treatment-related toxicity. Optimal dose fractionation and biologically effective dose (BED) levels for frail patients without histological confirmation remain undefined. Prospective trials are warranted to determine the most effective and safe SBRT regimens for this vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.