Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760175›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

Biodiversity Monitoring in Impact Assessment Follow-up - Insights From a Large-scale Mine in the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest.

Natália Takahashi Margarido, Philippe Hanna, Jos Arts, Larissa Ribeiro Souza, Luis Enrique Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natália Takahashi MargaridoDepartment of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Escola Politécnica, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. natalia.margarido@usp.br.ORCID 0000-0001-6991-2479
Philippe HannaSpatial Planning and Environment, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2399-5787
Jos ArtsSpatial Planning and Environment, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6896-3992
Larissa Ribeiro SouzaDepartment of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Escola Politécnica, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-6710
Luis Enrique SánchezDepartment of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Escola Politécnica, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6779-8481

Funding

Alcoa World Alumina through a research agreement with the University of São Paulo, managed by Fundação para o Desenvolvimento Tecnológico da Engenharia project #2139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity's intense decline and the consequences on human wellbeing are of major concern for society. Human activities such as mining, of growing presence in forest areas, threaten biodiversity. Monitoring and reporting for impact assessment follow-up have the purpose to provide and organize information about project impacts, assist decision-making, and improve impact management. However, evidence suggests that biodiversity impacts are not adequately addressed in the impact assessment follow-up process. This paper aims to identify and examine the key elements necessary for securing quality of monitoring and reporting of biodiversity impacts. Based on literature review, key elements of follow-up biodiversity monitoring reports were derived. A longitudinal document analysis was conducted for a bauxite mine operating in a highly biodiverse area, the Amazon, revealing challenges in the application of best practice. Our analysis of the case revealed four emerging issues relevant for improving follow-up practices in the extractive sector: advancing rigor, integration, meaningful stakeholder engagement, and adaptive management. We conclude that improving stakeholder engagement and going beyond compliance requirements, by adopting action plans based on long-term data and a transparent management system, can create a more effective and responsive management of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringMiningRainforestBrazilbauxite miningbiodiversityecosystem servicesfollow-upmonitoringsocio-ecological systemsstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID40760175
PMCPMC12457556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.