ArticleEnvironmental management2025
Biodiversity Monitoring in Impact Assessment Follow-up - Insights From a Large-scale Mine in the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest.
Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biodiversity's intense decline and the consequences on human wellbeing are of major concern for society. Human activities such as mining, of growing presence in forest areas, threaten biodiversity. Monitoring and reporting for impact assessment follow-up have the purpose to provide and organize information about project impacts, assist decision-making, and improve impact management. However, evidence suggests that biodiversity impacts are not adequately addressed in the impact assessment follow-up process. This paper aims to identify and examine the key elements necessary for securing quality of monitoring and reporting of biodiversity impacts. Based on literature review, key elements of follow-up biodiversity monitoring reports were derived. A longitudinal document analysis was conducted for a bauxite mine operating in a highly biodiverse area, the Amazon, revealing challenges in the application of best practice. Our analysis of the case revealed four emerging issues relevant for improving follow-up practices in the extractive sector: advancing rigor, integration, meaningful stakeholder engagement, and adaptive management. We conclude that improving stakeholder engagement and going beyond compliance requirements, by adopting action plans based on long-term data and a transparent management system, can create a more effective and responsive management of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.