ArticlePediatric research2026
Engagement of networks related to attention, executive function, and sensory processing during parental vs experimenter story-listening: an fMRI study.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural tracking of surprisal in Spanish-English bilingual children during naturalistic heritage language listening.Brain and language · 2026Article
- A literature-informed Delphi framework for pediatric medication science books.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaregivers shape children's reading abilities and neural networks. While joint reading is well-studied, the impact of parental storytelling on reading-related networks (executive function [EF], attention, sensory processing) before and at the early stages of reading acquisition remains unclear. This study examines whether parental storytelling differentially influences these networks compared to an experimenter's narration.
methodsTwenty-four Hebrew-speaking children (5.0-7.11 years; six females) and their parents participated. Pre-literacy and cognitive skills were assessed, and parents completed cognitive control and language questionnaires. Functional MRI data were collected as children listened to their parent narrate a picture-book story and an experimenter read an age-matched story. Functional connectivity within and between attention, EF, language, and sensory networks was analyzed and correlated with behavioral measures.
resultsParental storytelling elicited stronger connectivity across all networks. Increased EF, attention, and sensory network connectivity correlated positively with book exposure and negatively with reading hours. Stronger sensory processing connectivity during parental narration was linked to better pre-literacy skills. Enhanced audiovisual integration correlated with home literacy, pre-literacy, and later reading abilities.
conclusionsParental storytelling engages reading-related networks, supporting pre-literacy and future reading skills beyond exposure to an unfamiliar reader. IMPACT: The literature in the field of parent-child interaction and language development repeatedly points to the benefit of book reading to the child with respect to language development. However, whether there is a particular benefit specifically for parental reading is unknown and whether the child's brain is stimulated differently when the parent is reading a book (vs an experimenter) is also unknown. Our results show that parental reading engages brain regions related to cognitive abilities, attention, language abilities and future reading skills in children even prior to reading age. Parental reading is important for the development of these brain regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.