Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760162›Full record

Observational studyHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025

Predictive accuracy of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for preeclampsia and adverse outcomes: prospective, multicenter including primary, secondary, and tertiary care institutions, observational study in Japan.

Tomomi Yamazaki, Ana Sofia Cerdeira, Yuko Teraoka, Yuriko Oomori, Yurika Mukai, Jun Sugimoto, Iemasa Koh, Kouji Banno, Manu Vatish, Yoshiki Kudo

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tomomi YamazakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. yama1030@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Ana Sofia CerdeiraNuffield Department of Women's Health and Reproductive Research University of Oxford Level 3, Women's Center, John Radcliffe Oxford University Hospital Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yuko TeraokaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuriko OomoriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yurika MukaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Jun SugimotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Iemasa KohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kouji BannoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Manu VatishNuffield Department of Women's Health and Reproductive Research University of Oxford Level 3, Women's Center, John Radcliffe Oxford University Hospital Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yoshiki KudoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstetric care in Japan is organized in 3 levels and half of all deliveries are conducted at primary facilities without neonatal intensive care unit. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the onset of preeclampsia and adverse outcomes in pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia at multiple facilities in Japan, including primary facilities. 356 pregnant women from 18 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks of pregnancy were enrolled. 303 women were included in the final analysis. The negative predictive value for ruling out preeclampsia within 1 week using the cut-off value 38 was 98.4% (95% CI, 96.2-99.3) with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.53). The positive predictive value for ruling in preeclampsia within 4 weeks using the cut-off value 38 was 48.2% (95% CI, 38.0-58.5). The positive predictive value using a cut-off value of 85 was 65.0% (95% CI, 44.1-81.4) with a positive likelihood ratio of 12.21 (95% CI, 5.20-28.80). The positive predictive value for prediction of adverse outcomes within 4 weeks using the cut-off value 38 was 64.8% (95% CI, 53.1-75.0). To clarify the accuracy of the test currently covered by insurance in Japan, we additionally conducted an analysis focusing on pregnant women between 18 + 0 and 35 + 6 weeks, yielding even higher accuracy. Pregnant women with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >38 should be referred to a higher-level medical institution. The appropriate use of sFlt-1/PlGF supported by a robust collaboration between primary and tertiary care institutions may help to improve perinatal outcomes in Japan.

Indexed as

Placenta Growth FactorPre-EclampsiaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1AdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansJapanPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesBiomarkersFLT1 protein, humanPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1Adverse outcomesJapanPredictive accuracyPreeclampsiaThe sFlt-1/PlGF

Identifiers

PMID40760162
PMCPMC12497639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.