Observational studyHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Predictive accuracy of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for preeclampsia and adverse outcomes: prospective, multicenter including primary, secondary, and tertiary care institutions, observational study in Japan.
Observational study in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Angiogenic Imbalance in Preeclampsia: Profiling VEGF A, sFlt1, PlGF, and sFlt1/PlGF Ratios.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio as a Central Biomarker for Preeclampsia and Perinatal Outcomes: A Multisystem Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Isoforms in action: The impact of transcript diversity in phenotype.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Molecular Insights into Human Placentation: From Villous Morphogenesis to Pathological Pathways and Translational Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstetric care in Japan is organized in 3 levels and half of all deliveries are conducted at primary facilities without neonatal intensive care unit. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the onset of preeclampsia and adverse outcomes in pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia at multiple facilities in Japan, including primary facilities. 356 pregnant women from 18 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks of pregnancy were enrolled. 303 women were included in the final analysis. The negative predictive value for ruling out preeclampsia within 1 week using the cut-off value 38 was 98.4% (95% CI, 96.2-99.3) with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.53). The positive predictive value for ruling in preeclampsia within 4 weeks using the cut-off value 38 was 48.2% (95% CI, 38.0-58.5). The positive predictive value using a cut-off value of 85 was 65.0% (95% CI, 44.1-81.4) with a positive likelihood ratio of 12.21 (95% CI, 5.20-28.80). The positive predictive value for prediction of adverse outcomes within 4 weeks using the cut-off value 38 was 64.8% (95% CI, 53.1-75.0). To clarify the accuracy of the test currently covered by insurance in Japan, we additionally conducted an analysis focusing on pregnant women between 18 + 0 and 35 + 6 weeks, yielding even higher accuracy. Pregnant women with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >38 should be referred to a higher-level medical institution. The appropriate use of sFlt-1/PlGF supported by a robust collaboration between primary and tertiary care institutions may help to improve perinatal outcomes in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.