Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760134›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning in predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Chenyang Ling, Ning Tao, Abudukeyoumu Maimaitiyimin, Yifan Zhang, Miao Yao, Hongyu Pu, Xiaodong Li, Yujie Wang, Hengqing An

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Machine learning based prediction of recurrence in oral tongue cancer: a systematic review with quantitative synthesis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chenyang Ling *Department of Urological, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Ning Tao *Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Abudukeyoumu MaimaitiyiminDepartment of Urological, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Yifan ZhangXinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Miao YaoDepartment of Urological, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Hongyu PuDepartment of Urological, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xiaodong LiDepartment of Urological, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. 371099077@qq.com.
Yujie WangDepartment of Urological, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. 2338408282@qq.com.
Hengqing AnDepartment of Urological, Urology Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. 13201226586@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82360476The Key Projects of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 2022D01D39The Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2022D01C782The Regional Collaborative Innovation Special Project of the Autonomous Region, Science and Technology Support Program for Xinjiang 2024E02054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent malignant tumor in males, and many patients remain at risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following initial treatment. Accurate prediction of BCR is vital for effective clinical management and treatment planning. This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) models in predicting BCR among prostate cancer patients, comparing their performance to traditional prognostic methods. We systematically searched four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane) for studies employing ML techniques to predict prostate cancer BCR. Data extraction included model type, sample size, and the area under the curve (AUC). A meta-analysis was conducted using AUC as the primary performance metric to assess predictive accuracy and heterogeneity across models. Sixteen studies comprising a total of 17,316 prostate cancer patients were included. The pooled AUC for ML models was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81-0.84). Deep learning and hybrid models outperformed traditional models (AUC = 0.83). Models using imaging data showed improved performance (AUC = 0.82). ML models were most effective in predicting 1-year BCR (AUC = 0.86), with performance slightly decreasing for longer time intervals. ML models outperform traditional methods in predicting BCR, especially in the short term. Incorporating multimodal data, such as imaging, enhances predictive accuracy. Future studies should optimize and validate these models through large-scale clinical trials.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsArea Under CurveHumansMalePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40760134
PMCPMC12321981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.