ArticleScientific reports2025
Force fluctuations regulation and the role of neurophysiological mechanisms throughout different isometric contraction intensities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feature-Level Fusion of Surface Electromyography and Mechanomyography Signals for MVC-Normalized Shoulder Abduction Force-Level Classification in Healthy Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Force complexity is a key indicator of the neuromuscular system's adaptability and motor control. Although an inverted U-shaped relationship between force complexity and contraction intensity is established, its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To investigate whether changes in motor unit behaviour (recruitment and firing rate) would accompany and explain this relationship, 25 young male adults performed a 30-second knee extensors' hold-isometric task at 50%, 75%, 100%, 150% and 175% of their End-Test Torque (ETT), at individual's optimal angle. Force complexity and motor unit behaviour were assessed through Sample Entropy (SampEn) and high-density surface electromyography, respectively. We demonstrated a trend for an inverted U-shaped relationship between force complexity and contraction intensity, with SampEn at ETT and 150%ETT being significantly higher than at 50%ETT and 75%ETT (all p < 0.05). This pattern was accompanied by an increase in motor unit actions potentials and firing rate as the intensity increased up to 150%ETT (all p < 0.05). A multiple linear regression analysis showed that force complexity was explained in 18% by the vastus lateralis' motor unit behaviour. The findings suggest that changes in force complexity depend on contraction intensity and are partly explained by alterations in motor unit behaviour, influencing the neuromuscular system's adaptability to meet task demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.